Search results

The very same stadium that Sisu could well sell on together with the football club to new owners, having made a tidy profit, and then the new owners would charge the football club rent. Cos that's the way businesses run these days.

Simon Davies could be worth a look - I hear he turned out for his local village side as a sub a couple of weeks ago, just for the fun of it.

We didn't - so it's a pretty pointless question.

Proberly!

How about this from the PNE Forum Today 05:07 PM#4 princeinpieces A 4-3 win could have been the result that gave us some real momentum for the rest of the season and put us into the top 10 today. However, 6 goals conceded in 2 games gives the perennial moaners another cylinder of oxygen to...

But in those games, we also scored 9 of our own, and in the league we have a zero goal difference. Bending facts to suit an argument doesn't always work.

"From little acorns mighty oaks doth grow" - or something like that:rolleyes:

Depends on how you analyse the figures. You could say that in 7 years they have turnover of over £86Million and profits of over £45Million. And if the turnover is based on a 0.5% management fee, you do the maths on how much their investors are ahead, so I would doubt that they would be in any...

Just to put that into perspective - if their turnover was 0.5% of the fund's profit, then the total managed fund for their investors in the year that SISU made £26M must have been £26M x 0.5%, which equals a fund profit of £5,120M for their investors - in just one year. That's serious financial...

Correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't ACL set up by the council, with the council as major shareholders?

Could always appeal to Sepp Blatter!

You obviously didn't read the bit that said "Does anybody know just what it would mean to CCC if the review was granted and CCC was ultimately found to be guilty as charged?"

Now that it looks an almost certainty that CCFC Ltd will be liquidated, it would appear to be a cast-iron certainty that the application fror judicial review by SISU against CCC will go ahead. Does anybody know just what it would mean to CCC if the review was granted and CCC was ultimately...

What exactly are you suggesting by your last comment? Pretty low if you ask me.

I agree, especially if it means that when (if) we come out of admin and the embargo is lifted, Pressley gets the green light to sign some of the players he's been lining up. My glass is still very much half full and looking to get fuller.

Do keep up. That's just the F&B revenue for 23 days a year. There's a lot more potential income to be derived for a 365 day per year stadium deal.

Exactly my thoughts. It's unlikely to be HMRC because they are not owed anything, There's a relatively small amount of VAT, and there's a reason for that so there's no great excitement there. Which leaved a lot of clutching at straws, hoping that something - anything - might turn up that will...

Or, looked at another way, it's another investment cost that will be more than recovered when (if) SISU eventually decide to sell, having put the club in its own stadium, showing a positive return for their financial investors who seem quite happy to keep backing SISU with the aim of a...

Well done for the report son. Can I just mention that I'm finding the blue and white colour scheme a bit hard to read, and suggest that a change of font colour from blue to black would make an interesting report much easier for these old eyes to read. Keep up the good work.

Could just as easily say that the one thing that we can be sure of is that "the secretive" Joy Seppala couldn't give a shit about all the conjecture - on other threads it has often been said that there's no such thing as bad publicity.