Search results

It's also an anagram of choir, maybe Gareth Malone had something to do with it

Can't quite make up my mind if you've become predictably boring, or boringly predictable:sleep:

Took the bait nicely there!:claping hands:

I remember some bastard ....but that's where my memory gets a bit hazy. Nurse, is it time for my Ovaltine yet?

That's a response that makes sense, although I still don't see why any extra legal costs should need to be incurred in defending 'fishing expeditions' if they are not needed - Cue predictable diatribes on SISU and Ms Seppala's litigation history!

That's not attempting to answer the question, merely employing the classic deflection tactic ;)

Playing Devil's Advocate here: If the council have nothing to hide, why have they tried so hard to prevent the details of the loans, etc. from being disclosed into the public domain?

What confuses me here is the assumption that if SISU can manage to buy the freehold, then ACL's long-term management lease will become a big problem, but is this actually so? If ACL's contract is with the existing freeholder (CCC), and SISU negotiate an unencumbered sale of the freehold, then...

..... And then to Zanzibar for a couple of weeks with no wifi and not much news access Please let me come home to some positive news about our future - this saga has gone on for far too long!

There's this song that goes "There's a hole in my bucket, Dear Lisa, Dear Lisa ..........................."

I've been thinking along those same lines myself, and my conclusion is that the majority of posters on this site are heavily biased against anything that has anything even remotely positive about SISU, whether it is logical or not (and in most cases it is not). The standard request to prove this...

There's some seriously big cocks around tonight - bet they need wheelbarrows to carry them around!!

I think what he actually said was that he could only see two options, and wasn't prepared to go along with either of them so he was going to continue starving SISU out.

There's loads of people who have their homes on interest only mortgages who are in exactly that position, so it's a pretty widespread, normally accepted practice. So why is it being made such a huge issue here? If it's a means of uniting the club with the ground and gaining revenue streams that...

My missus won't let me do that anymore since the guinea pig disappeared.

Still here then?

Being pedantic, that's not strictly true. What the investors will want is to see their money working for them and yielding a return. They will obviously want to see that their money is safe, although even that is not an absolute per-requisite, depending on the risk strategy they have. For some...

What a gloom-and-doom monger. If you're a typical Cov fan there's no hope, is there?

I'm not sure if I'm confused or not.