Search results

Ok, so now we know what sisu will do. But does it show their intentions? Maybe - if(!) sisu can stay in control, this is what I guess their strategy is: Over the next few months they will learn if ACL really have a potential buyer lined up and if this buyer is prepared to pay what is...

Bearing in mind that TF recently said the club might go into liquidation if the rent row is not solved (ACL agree to all ccfc terms), then I won't be too surprised if sisu appoint their own administrator before 10am tomorrow. It's the only thing sisu can do to make sure they stay in control of...

Because making sure ccfc stay separated from the stadium is more important than community service?

Maybe because it doesn't benefit sisu or the club?

Your financial math is slightly flawed. Read here: http://www.skybluestalk.co.uk/threads/11316-FAQ-2-Money-Talks Edit: No claims in there, only facts extracted from the accounts.

Or - just a provoking thought - as the final offer is just pennies away from the clubs initial request, ACL could have accepted at the first meeting. Then there wouldn't be arrears to fight in court.

So not too far from the guesstimated £10m ...

So in reality you want a sugardaddy and to Hell with financial stability?

Why is it important if he's a millionaire or billionaire? If he has the money to take over the club and ACL that should be enough for us. He aint going to pour tens of mio into the playing squad anyway ... the FFP prevents that.

ACL are the only ones who can prevent the court case, but I don't think they will. It really looks like a well orchestrated plan: 1) Get Elliot/Hoffman to find potential new owners 2) Push ccfc into administration to force the change of ownership 3) Inform the Trust that new owners are looking...

If come next season we start on -25 pt I will be gutted!

This! We have to remember his part in bringing in sisu! Or should we just forget the history?

He's a Yankie - not a wanker. And Mother Theresa? Please we can't afford more charity.

Ah, but what about due dilligence. You know the stuff people say sisu didn't do properly and subsequently led to the rent-strike and falling out with ACL? Due dilligence take weeks. And requires access to all books, agreements and contracts currently in sisu's posession.

It really doesn't matter. He will install a board with Elliott and Hoffman who have vast experience in running a football club.

And that would mean another 15 pt penalty. Are the Trust supporting that?

But here's a question that was put to PWKH a few weeks ago: And he answered: So did the club ask for a rent reduction prior to the rent strike, or did they just stop paying without a warning? Or did PWKH say indirectly that there may have been an approach by the club, but ACL refused...

Just because the Trust and the Trust management is demanding transparency and openness from the club, it doesn't mean ....

I don't know how big the total portfolio of sisu is, but I am pretty sure it is many times bigger than ccfc. Thing is with investments - some pays a dividend, some don't. Some pays big time, some lose big time. Investors knows this is the nature of the game. You can't have only wins, there will...

I know too little about the cards each party is holding and the replications of their potential actions to form an oppinion if administratrion is the most appealing option right now. I believe that ACL and ccfc should be one entity controlled by the same owner and if the administration path...