Search results

So in short: He is either stupid or a criminel? And a stooge on top of that. I am sorry, but it's when you are that disrespectful your judgement gets clouded. Ask yourself this: What would you feel if there was an investigation and nothing major was found and in the proces the club had missed...

He is an officer of the court and has a duty to report any illegal action he encounter. Sisu are NOT his clients, so there are no obligations to them.

But what if it really is as simple as - till this morning - ACL would have nothing to do with sisu? ACL have been very open about their agenda: They want sisu out. In that atsmophere I can see why a groundshare in (e.g.) Northampton would be the only option. If say sisu had kept coming back to...

If so can he prove it was moved with the intent of defrauding the creditors? Apparantly not - he has a duty to report anything like that to the court.

What exactly do you want to achieve? I want the club and team to stabilize and find some footing again. It's been long enough. I want the team to succeed on the pitch, players to play without the distraction of fans fighting themself and the owners. I want the club to start making money and...

I know you want there to be an illegal action - but quoting the law doesn't make your dream any more real. But maybe you have proof?

Then we are about the same level, though I've never worked in banking. So I assume you - as I have - in many occasions have had to listen to the experts in regards to your own company. The experts being accountants, auditors and lawyers. Just like TF. If you and I listened and never took...

Last term we lost at least 10 points in the start of the season and was further deducted 10 points towards the end. We still was some way above the relegation zone. And we still have the backbone of the squad: Murphy, Baker, Moussa, Clarke. We won't get relegated!

Two things we need to remember: 1) Holdings and Limited shared the same bank account. That mean it will be extremely difficult to argue for/against any transfer involving cash - e.g. player transfers. 2) Limited was established in 1995 - and since then there have been multiple boards, multiple...

Good question! But surely refusing a CVA will leave to a severe points penalty? I think he meant that the club would live on - it wouldn't die altogether as has previously been a myth on this board.

I don't think it would be worth the minus 15 points and not be able to use this trandsfer window. They may find 'something' but surely not enough to send someone to prison or change the terms of the administration. With all the of accountants and lawyers in sisu's armory, I don't think they...

Yes, you did a great job! The FL would never tell ACL at an official meeting that they had been threatned by sisu!

I don't really think he said it as a 'fact' but more an assumption. He is not stupid and won't make unfounded allegations.

I was quite amused when PWKH on one hand accused sisu of threatning the FL with legal actions and on the other hand said they were considering not signing the CVA as that was the only way to make sure there would be an investigation into possible illegal asset stripping in Limited. One thing I...

Very good job on following the talk and write it here Don! You must be soaking in sweat now.

And what might that contingency plan be? If doesn't originate from Appelton or Holdings/Otium it will have no relevans to FL. If ACL reject the CVA, next move will come from Appelton, and it would likely be liquidation, but only after the cooling off period. The only real contingency plan I can...

I don't think he is a subscriber to this forum ...

The lease is irrelevant to the FL. They have already accepted the club can play home games at sixfilds.

But it's not up to the FL, is it? They have no legal right to interfere in the administration proces. They can only await the decisions of the administrator and then decide where the golden share should go. If ACL decline the CVA and the administrator liquidate the company, there's nothing the...

I did mean Holdings ... sorry. Still, allegations are not proof. Fisher could not move assets, it would require at least the corporation with the accountants, the finance director and possibly the auditors. Somebody inside the group and below top management would know - and tell somebody else...