Search results

We get in the top 6 and start doing well at home it's going to be regularly around the 14,000 - 15,000 mark.

Glad both stadiums could have incorporated the 15,000 we had yesterday.

Hinckley 4,329 Rushden 6,441

Think Hinckley was 4,200 and Rushden just over 6,000.

Yep. 19 and not been playing first team football here for 4 years. Big, big difference. People may just want to ignore what i said though. What I actually was saying was in talking about if in the future Thomas continues to keep getting injured again and again over a long period of time.

It was Harry Roberts who brought it up. Seems quite clear there was a lackadaisical feel about the place. Don't think we need to keep just regurgitating things, but this is new info and supposedly insider info. This may well have greatly contributed to our being relegated, so it is important.

What, with AT as Ted Bovis? Sorry, that is my criticising a former CCFC employee and that is not allowed. We should not poke fun at anyone associated with the club EVER!!! :whistle:

Really? You think so. Think we need to give him a chance. When he gets to having been here 4 years though and hardly played, then i would be looking him very seriously as to whether he was a liability or not. I would definitely give Conor Thomas time myself. You of course are welcome to...

He's had a few though hasn't he? Pretty sure it's not just the same injury.

Don't know if anyone else picked up on this yesterday, but Harry was saying he'd been asking a few questions behind the scenes at the club. Questions that are not usually asked. He says he was told by a few people that previously (under Thorn and Shaw) it was all quite easy going around the...

On CWR yesterday Stuart Linnell said he had been talking to a lawyer and he was told this; 1. It will take months for a winding-up order to come to court. 2. The judge might throw it out because it has been an on-going issue for some time and he may say they should have brought the action far...

Going to take him more than 10 years to get to 100 games at this rate.

I know. Sorry, should have made that clear. Understood what you were saying. The state this club is in and the little amount of money available, simply means we cannot afford to keep players on the treatment table for month after month after month. Unless things improve, the same label is...

Think it only appears to those with penis envy. I get quite normal ads on mine.

Think people are missing the point somewhat. (though the talented Mr. Hill as usual gets the gist straight away) It's not whether David Bell is any good or not, it's how appalling his injury record has been. That was the 'passenger' comment. Passenger based on the amount of games he plays for...

Very true. Bell has been a bad signing. No-one can argue otherwise, talented or not. We just can't afford to carry passengers.

Was just poking fun. I was joking yes, but it wasn't a 'joke.' If it were a joke it would have a punchline. People need to lighten up. You're like bears with sore heads! ;)

It's been a waste of wages for sure. 85 games in 4 years. If we can get him fit I would be looking to offload him. Football is a business and cannot be run on sentiment. His wages could bring in a good player who will be more readily available.

I know. I said Andy Thorn was fat once and I had to endure 6 days of hate mail and death threat phone calls and rotten eggs thrown at my windows. All the neighbours sent me to Coventry too. Which was pretty pointless of course, cos I was already here.

Hand in your Sky Blue membership, remove your tatoo's and find yourself with a lifetime ban from City games you traitor!! :whistle: