Search results

Not necessarily. It has been proven that CCC have also used subterfuge - we don't however know if it is "equally as shady" because we don't have access to SISU's emails. Theirs could be far worse. We don't know why CCC acted as they did - we have only selected excerpts of the story. Steve West...

What Level should we stoop to? ML saying Joy was magniminous in the CT in not asking for costs from Higgs when the judge was of the opinion each side should pay their own anyway? What crap from him and what crap from you.

It's great that they have kept us alive the last few years, but I doubt the motives are because they particulary want the soccer club. It is more likely that by keeping the club alive they can get a deal on the stadium - their stated aim. Sorry to disappoint you. The council are trying not to...

They charged the agreed rent which wasn't really challenged for the first 6 years - that means it was accepted. The relegation put it into perspektive. The 44 million debt didn't come just because of the rent.

What have they won? League 1 status in Northampton, 44 million debt, still no ACL share. Victory at being stubborn maybe, but nothing concrete ( not even the Ricoh ). The unstoppable beast is charging into a brick wall.

Are you one of those "open minds"? Up until now I had you as a SISU spokesman...

@RFC. Says you tongue in cheek....

The ( selective ) truth as here, does show the council in a bad light. Let's see the rest to get the full picture. There is a lot more to come..... From both sides.

judge made plain that the criticisms made by Sisu of the Trustees' conduct were "misplaced and unfortunate allegations" = bullshit

Yes, but why not just say I don't owe you 29000 as it's not my fault that the talks broke down? Then Higgs would have lost anyway and have to pay all costs. SISU wouldn't have needed their army of lawyers.

Don't forget the counter claim of 290000 which ran up the lawyer's bill.

Who is greedy? Did ACL ask for 290000 or SISU?

I bet you are..... Late equalizer saved SISU's bacon. I agree with the judge though.

Exciting finish! Only winners are the lawyers. Shows considerable lack of judgement by both sides. Hopefully we as fans are a bit wiser as to what SISU's position is and what their aims are. Generally speaking I am not impressed with their business strategy. It all seems pretty desperate to me...

In this case and the JR it is perfectly understandable as, compared withe the last few games in League 1 played in a different town with no chance of relegation or promotion, the future ownership of the club will be decided. If SISU are shown the door here, they probably will also be shown it at...

Who would that be?

There have been people maligning CCC and ACL all the time and gleefully waiting for the final proof that it is all their fault that CCFC is in the present position. Always seeking an alternative argument to the obvious point that SISU are in charge and that they carry the can. There are now more...

Looks like the start of melt down on your side of the fence to be honest.

Is she on the board of CCFC? The rent strike was a deliberate act which could have resulted in her soccer club being forced to play in a different city. That is significant. Other cock-ups were not necessarily premeditated or so definate in their potential working. No way would she not have been...

She's not a politician and she is referring to a high profile investment by her company. IMO she says "we" because she took the decision with Tim, otherwise she would have said Tim is in charge of CCFC, please ask him about ACL etc.. For SISU to claim now that it was Tim at CCFC, is ludicrous.