As I said on the other thread, Oldham in the second half suddenly started pressuring us much higher up the pitch and kept closing us down. This then meant we couldn't play the ball out from the back and RCC had to resort to kicking it long.
We did that and the ball kept coming back to us, so TM...
He is. As well as all his skill, pace and goal-prowess, he also works really hard too, which then leads to defensive errors from the opposition.
Murhpy is a lot more hit and miss.
Don't think we should overreact here.
People are talking about cracks, but last week we should have won that game and there was no way we deserved to lose. Key decisions went against us.
Today we were seconds from victory and TM has said RCC was clearly fouled.
Would people be talking of...
And so too had Kent passed instead of taking that shot in the first half that went wide of the post. We had 2 players in the box waiting for the ball in.
You think Kent played well? I noticed he got a standing ovation when he went off, but again I found him really frustrating with his lack of end product.
TM saying RCC was fouled for their goal, so is that the keeper's fault?
It's okay, Glen, we know you only pop up when things go wrong and then disappear into the ether every time things go right. :whistle:
Oldham were quite clever in that they almost forced TM's hand into bringing Fortune on. They suddenly started pressing us high up and the pitch and closing us down and RCC had to resort to long boots up the field. It was a battle neither Cole or Armstong were ever going to win, so TM had to...
Don't think we need to get too carried away with dissecting the team and today's performance.
1. We missed Fleck. No doubt about it. Bigi did okay, but Fleck would get the vote over him every day of the week without question.
2. We badly missed Ricketts. Missed his calmness and organisation of...