Search results

Agree about the Sky Blue, but you include the word 'future'. It may be a choice of successful future or dismal future. That could swing things.

I mentioned red bull yonks ago. They have Leipzig third in the Bundesliga - they bought in in the the 5. or 6. tier of German football. They have a safe rental agreement with naming rights at their stadium and plans to build an 80000 stadium. They have nothing in U.K. Football. Loads of money...

Do you know that they 'piss themselves at the fans' or did you just make that up?

Sorry, could you translate that into comprehensible English please? No offence meant.

It is the usual crap - with some good points dotted in between. He is pissed off that the Telegraph's bollocks has more support than his own. He rightly portrays the Trust as a motley crew without a plan... without pushing the point that SISU is a posher crew without a long term plan...

There is no plan with 'SISU in'...

Who is Hannity rooting for? Bill O'Reilly?

A propos inaccurate. .

They were started in Germany, particulary East Germany ( there are more neo-Nazis pro capita in the East ) by a known criminal, a burglar called Lutz Bachmann. The idea was for the Christian world to stand up against the muslim invasion. They go on 'evening strolls' once a week in places such as...

Grendel has been at you about your UKIP vote. It doesn't make me look any cleverer than I am by quoting that. You posted on here that your UKIP vote was a protest vote. I assume that that is the truth and so I don't need to ask you. Steve is a special case. He has resigned from the Trust to...

Quote: Tony ( UKIP Tony ) 'It is what you want it to be. You can except that Steve is right on CCFC and take part in what he's organising or you can put a barrier up because of his unconnected views to fighting for the club. Either way on this occasion Steve isn't the one putting barriers up...

Well let's just see how this pans out. No-one, except yourself, sees this as anything other than a CCFC protest. The problem is not the protest. It is not the content of the protest. It is that the leader of the protest has unwittingly outed himself by his tweets and retweets as a racist and a...

Bollocks. Is it better to let Steve carry on and maybe at the right/ wrong time be publically discredited thus damaging the cause, or to point out the danger and hope that he has the sense to prevent this happening? Why do you want him/her to identify his/herself publically? I would think with...

I disagree. The usual political crap is confined to SISU, CCFC, CCC etc.. We're in a different league here. Tommy Robinson, Pegida, EDL, Britain First and the rest. Our leader ( German translation = Führer ;-) ) has been outed by his own Twitter account at an extremely sensitive time. Whether...

No one has suggested that. Read my posts as an example. He can have his views. That is not the point. He has put himself in the limelight and can be attacked for his unsavory connections. We need to be squeaky clean and extremely professional. This Twitter saga shows that we are far from it.

He was involved in an offer to discuss taking control of CCFC. He resigned from the Trust to lead / organise a group of people involved in a non political dispute. By him following a row of unsavoury or extremely biased groups and tweeting and retweeting his and their comments, we do actually...

Ffs this guy was head of a group offering to discuss taking control of CCFC. He is now leading a consortium of groups on a protest. He is at the front, in the limelight under the spotlight and he has still been retweeting racist ( oder anti certain religions crap ), still follows scum and up...

Yes, that is my point. I am sure that not everybody holds or shares my views, but I would try to be squeaky clean and neutral - at least on the web, if I were leading something.

Yes, but they are not representing us. If he has those views, it would be sensible to hide them if he wants to be a figurehead of a non political ( hopefully ) fan group.