Search results

favourite sentence (was going to say line) of the day !!!

I’d imagine with hindsight, London would’ve gone in and out of lockdown sooner and North later. Who knows though. The fact that we exited at the same time is apparently part of the issue with the Norths virus resurgence ....having said all that the London palladium was open last week, looking...

Yeah, never understood the 20 per 100000 to be added to UK quarantine list. Looks a bit silly when we’re at current numbers !! ps think the Cov numbers are a concern, guess they will be moved to Tier two (no household mixing) in coming days if they’ve not been already. It’s all levels as...

Agreed. From memory additional restrictions got implemented in Birmingham after going over 100 or 150 per 100,000. This was 10pm curfew non mixing of households. I think Bolton was over 250 when bars were closed (and could only serve takeaways). my comparison was between very high risk ie...

this will be interesting ! Last week Germany courts overruled the bar curfew restrictions implemented in Berlin saying the science doesn’t back it up

Will have a read

low as in when considering lockdowns Pete (mentioned in another message to NW). Will amend to read ‘lower’

like I said they would yesterday (it was politics bullshit)

Not attacking anyone, talking about the thread. I’m just saying it’s bizarre. So burnhams happy for people in lower transmission areas to potentially be put out of work and/or receive a lower proportion of their salary (some of which may be struggling already). Yeah, makes sense

relatively low rates....as in insufficient to justify closing everything down in a location. People quote numbers without thinking about them (not necessarily you NW) like billions being thrown around like it’s nothing. 50 or 100 people per 100,000 !!!! That means in a city the size of coventry...

yeah, the track and trace isn’t working and probably should follow a more localised approach (which I’ve said before). I’ve also said before that Hancock and Harding should’ve gone.

Again, unsurprising on here... a comment being taken out of context. I’d said local lockdowns should be properly/better supported (and thought Burnham was right to push for more for Manchester) however, I don’t agree with a national lockdown...which he weirdly also supported. By the way though...

Great point although deserved all three

Finish shippers !!!

Idiotic and pretty shameful

Of course it’s politics, all politicians want to even seen to be fighting for their constituents, whatever party they belong to. I also can’t see the government not giving Manchester what was previously offered (if what all reports are saying is correct). As i say, a lot of politics thrown in

FFS, I can’t win ! I’ve said I support what he was trying to do Fernando, I was texting briefly whilst trying to cook my tea so I can watch the match, sorry if I didn’t present the position in greater detail/more clearly 🤷‍♂️😂

Yes

Scary !!!!

Just saying that’s what I’d read. What’s wrong ? AB wanted more money, government didn’t want to give more support. ps if you read earlier posts I said I supported his position by the way (apart from that he said he wanted a national lockdown/circuit break which would’ve meant paying off...