Search results

It’s about what I expected actually.

Ok. I was referring to the country doing well. The majority. More than 52%. We didn’t need to leave because of the economy.

The EU is 28 countries committed to separation of legislative and judicial systems. Poland is intending politicizing the judiciary. The Daily Mail called our judiciary traitors, so they are probably on Poland‘s side in this. You too I assume.

The country as a whole was doing well. Did we leave solely because of fishery policies?

As the article says: „optimism remains well below its level before last year’s Brexit vote, a survey by Lloyds Bank showed on Friday.“

It is you who should read it. A bureaucrat is an impartial public servant, not a dictator. If you don’t like the rules he is following you have to vote to change the administration he is working for. The bureaucrats don’t pass the laws. They administer them.

We’re getting the blue passports to show our identity- as requested.

We have all done well out of the EU. We are leaving to take back sovereignty, get rid of migrants and have blue passports, not because the economy was not doing well.

It’s not a joke that he had to flee. He held an illegal referendum. The point of the vote is that Spain wanted clarity and hoped that the people that boycotted the illegal referendum would vote for a government wanting a union with Spain. Now we have the next Brexit type situation where there...

EU Statement: The European Commission says that its stance towards Catalonia remains the same. The executive arm of the EU has previously stated that events in Catalonia are an internal issue for Spain. "Our position on the question of Catalonia is well known and has been regularly...

Next? Maybe they will become independent. Let’s see if that has an effect on Northern Ireland if they do. The votes are about even, but the three independence parties get more seats. They don’t get on with each other though, so they are going to have to sort their differences out. The EU has...

In an unregulated privatised economy there will be many new jobs. But, how many will be low paid, who is checking on minimum wage, or gig jobs or zero hours? Jobs = good, but Forbes was looking at it purely from an investors point of view.

How many take out is irrelevant. What is relevant is whether we do well out of it. The billions have to be measured against costs incurred by not being in and possible trading disadvantages. We were doing well.

They don’t care about what people are supposed to be investing in. Their report isn’t an answer to a specific situation. It is a list of countries which they consider good for a punt by investors. It is neutral, as you say, from a political angle. It is taken only from an investors point of...

No. Please explain. We have already had to replace 20 EU offices and are recruiting thousands of civil servants ( faceless bureaucrats) to replace the EU faceless bureaucrats that used to fulfill these functions for us. I would like to know what the cost of replacing EU bureaucrats with UK...

Who needs what financing, and what are you talking about? Why don’t you just enlighten me by telling me what point you are getting at?

That it is about investment and not specifically about how the economy is doing. Which is why USA was 23. and is now only 11. although it is a strong economy. Having less regulations and a labour Force with a lot of educated people counts for a lot in this report. Germany has more regulations...

How is the German economy doing without being recommended by Forbes?

I’ll take a guess.. it means foreign banks won’t need subsidiaries in the UK? Are you now going to say that means there won’t be thousands of job losses in the UK? Against Forbes predictions? Or why have you mentioned that?

Who is clueless? I explained what the report was about. You didn’t. You just posted it and said it proves your argument.