Search results

What is the detail on the revenue access? That's probably the reason why they won't accept.

olderskyblue - This is 2 I was referring to yesterday.

Amount of times NBC have bailed out Sixfields complex....... Zero

I wish this had happened too. I also remember the season when Leicester were relegated instead of us, and thinking as much as I was happy - we should have gone down. We may well have been in a much better place now.

How about this one? http://www.coventrytelegraph.net/news/coventry-news/fans-poll-shows-huge-chunk-6930683 That epically huge poll of how many.... 397 people? My personal favourite is the one from the beginning of the season where he publicly humiliates 2 twitter users for saying they would...

Most of his stories are the same. Big explosive headline... Then the finer detail tells it slightly different. My point is that people will just read headline and form their opinion. You only have to look on a Twitter to see that happens frequently. The fact that £136 was donated to that...

I explained this in another thread, but if you take the article on the recent court case, the way he structured his headline, and sub headline implied it was SISU that took Higgs to court, not the other way round.

The main reason I just appear to have Higgs/ACL questions is because everything that SISU has done has been scrutinised, analysed and deconstructed. What's Higgs/ACL have been doing has generally gone under the media radar. That's why I have the questions primarily for them. One thing I do...

I'm not saying he is hiding facts, but he presents them in a way that is not entirely accurate, and often adapts the context of his pieces. He did also go big on that ridiculous Highfield Group thing yesterday....

That could well be true. His name is on the article though.

Yeah - they got it... Or certainly that's what the documents says. But it was only £6.7m. The link is on Pg 21 I think... Save you wading.

Not really no... Because we are talking about the financial security and long term future of our football club. So that's not good enough in my opinion.

You don't need me for that.... CET have that covered.

I'm not trying to completely blame the Council for all of this... What I am proposing is that they took a course of action, and it's not unreasonable for us to know the reasons why. Why did they do the deal with the council for £14m. They knew (and said as much) that it would cause huge tension...

I think that does sum up two of the key factors. That will be what the JR will tell us. But at some point negotiations did occur - and some kind of deal was agreed - even if only provisionally. That's not one sides version of events.

Michael I did see your thread and your questions but I am not able to answer them. If I could I would happily do so. As for your other questions, you have highlighted perfectly my some of my frustrations. I am just a normal fan. I have a season ticket. I don't travel generally to away games as...

You've missed my point - I'm not trying to argue the reasons behind what happened. And you are right until we have the same statement from CCC there may be additional events that took place. But you can't dispute that a HoT was agreed - even if it was not followed through. We will get all the...

No

Come on you're no mug. You know exactly what you are doing. That's the PR finesse.

There are plenty of people... just have a look at Twitter.