Search results

Context is very clever thing. In your headline you state Coventry City owner in court battle with charity. Your sub heading then says claim and counter-claim which implies that's the order of action respectively. SISU claim, Higgs counter-claim. You then reversed the name sequence further...

So do tell us about the 'statement of facts' produced for the court case - I didn't even know one existed. Share it all with us. And last time I checked the judge threw out BOTH SISU's counterclaim and the original claim from Higgs. In which case both sides put forward this 'selective and...

It sounds like a scene from Fonejacker.... 'We just need your bank account and sort code'

The funny thing about coming out of the woodwork is that you expose the cracks...

I posted a new one today. check it out :D

I'm pretty sure that the link to the file I posted earlier states they did. Check it out

On a slightly different note... I wonder of Higgs would have wanted half of the £7m fee from IoC straight away? That would have been a good windfall for them and their charity to invest on their ventures.

Yes it was. But you don't produce a document for court with 5000 pages of supplementary evidence that is completely fictional. If they for example said a meeting happened on a specific date then it was supplemented with minutes. Or if an email correspondence happened copies of it are put in. If...

I meant a potential of Higgs' share to SISU.

So does that explain why Higgs deal was immediately vetoed?

But your clearly said that Higgs did not accept the £2m offer. But then you said an agreement was in place that SISU backed out of by not completing. So which is it??

Did you read the Statement of Facts produced for the JR application? That is possibly where it came from. In the document there were stacks of emails, meeting minutes,correspondence with parties etc which may give this kind of info.

So in principle the price you've quoted was agreed?

Did Higgs and SISU ever come to heads of terms agreements? If they did that would indicate some agreement on price.

Yes. Thank you Nick. It would never be part of a potential sale of Higgs' share.

That would only last for 7 yrs at a max. So from 2009 to 2016. And there is no way that ACL would have allowed that money to be part of the deal. So it's virtually irrelevant.

Any Higgs sale could not be done without consent of the council. That was in the Joint Ventures Agreement set out in 2003.

I do not know the answer to that. What was their share worth? Was it valued by anyone? Assuming that Higgs would have recieved some profits from the complex as a whole from its creation until now may have impacted on the price of the share. I personally think that SISU should have paid the...

Could well have done.. I wasn't at the negotiations.... you?

Is that why you love me? Don't be afraid to let it show.