Search results

Apologies if already covered, but if the council valued ACL as 'zero net value' then surely a £14m loan to a business with no value makes no sense? It is even more complicated/confusing because ACL have no assets other than a long term lease...

Maybe dollars give you a better conversion to the Nigerian Naira

Without question.

It was a tongue in cheek comment, not referring to any inaccuracies. Incidentally - what's the thought process behind the story... Are you not at all sceptical??

Maybe it beats reporting actual factual information.

If the club choose to fund the squad with equity they can. So the point on FFP is moot. Additionally equity injected cannot be added to the debt.

Who cares?

CCFC have made a loss every year they've been here. So one would assume in a similar way as before. Except now any money they inject into the club is as a donation, so can't end up as debt.

Can't see Elliott and Hoffman scraping together £30 - never mind £30m. Hoffman - White Dhinsa

Please... some of us want to eat tonight... and not just those two.

Apart from some clarification of the 'revenue streams' and what that means for the club, I think that's a perfectly plausible and sensible idea.

I'm not defending it all. But it does illustrate the importance of revenue access. And your final sentence about FFP is inaccurate. You seem to think that because attendances are shit that means we will be FORCED to have no playing budget. I'm afraid that is simply not true.

Yes if it is piss poor then you are right. There are also conditions that effect what is classed as your 'wage bill'. For example home-grown players (English/British) that were registered for 3 years before their 21st birthday, (which would then imply all home grown players under 21.. of which...

Again.... our playing budget can be set at the level the owners wish it to be. They will have to supplement it with donations that will not be able to added as debt. See below: - SCMP in its most basic definition for League 1 for this season limits player wages to 60% of your forecast turnover...

Michael - you have ignored some of my questions earlier in the thread - I'm not demanding an answer am I? The solution lies in negotiation. Now you are right, there has been little if any movement from either side in this so far. However it is kind of to be expected given the impending JR...

Make your mind up Michael... you either want to pursue the SISU out line or you want to actively be involved in a negotiation strategy. Trouble is I can't tell from post to post which one it is.

How about finding a solution where CCFC return to the Ricoh and some kind of working relationship is established between the parties, so that CCFC is on a sound financial footing. Isn't that your mantra?

It's one thing wanting the current owners to leave... But you've hardly provided a compelling alternative which would see the club exist in any form in the future.

Firstly - no one has said SISU have been good for us so far. Really... because I am confused... Your comment from 1 week ago. Excerpts from your OP yesterday. Now forgive me if I feel you are a little contradictory.

I'm not surprised McDonald was picked for Wolves - he was the best player on the pitch yesterday.