Search results

No it's the fault of both sides. Frankly both are as culpable as each other. SISU as we know them as have been bloody minded and arrogant, failed to be forthcoming enough and played it like a card game when they were not getting what they wanted. Should they expect to be given the Ricoh? Of...

So CCFC Ltd which held the lease to play at the Ricoh were taken to court by ACL in order to facilitate a decision to appoint an administrator as they claim the club insolvent having had debt orders twice ignored? Fair enough. The day before CCFC Ltd have a hearing they get CCFC Ltd placed into...

If the shares are with CCFC Ltd then we must assume they did not transfer them to the holding company? I find that strange as the share option would be considered an asset and it has been stated in court last Thursday when SISU had placed the CCFC Ltd in admin that it had no assets? If it is...

I think this is largely journalistic license at best. Several facts contained in the Times story are wrong which makes it less true. I believe CCFC Holdings have the right to purchase back the charity shares? Unless they have handed that back with the Ricoh keys I don't think Haskell or anyone...

G'day mate! Good rant but we are not in admin. The little side show company that has no assets was placed in admin not CCFC Holdings which is the one that is not in court on Tuesday.

The Council have acted disingenuously from the get go it now appears as more information filters through. The whole mess of setting up ACL was a mistake....why did they not negotiate a deal with the football club only? Can't see how it is right for the stadium to still be in the hands of...

Wow some wacky thoughts here. In fact it is so long ago I can't remember anymore either. Roughly though : The football club originally bought the land, Robinson I think stumped up money and the football club put in 10m at the beginning. When they could not fund the project the council...

The guy said no such thing. It waffled and it was clear they took the action based on conversations nothing concrete whatsoever. they are crazy!

Is he saying it's personal? jeez! Everything exist in companies, it should never be about personal views and does never have to be. They clearly need to re-evaluate their stance. If they agree the football club should own the stadium then that should have been done years ago...

Don't think they have thought this out fully and hang their hat on 'probables' that were not even there. They have clue for me and out of their depth. They will be complicit if this all goes bad.

Fletcher making sense.... The crux of the matter. The stadium. Will the council sell the stadium and land? I've said all along that is the only outcome and they should give SISU the opportunity to at least have some right to that so they can get some investment back and leave.

Legally CCFC holdings are not tenants of the Ricoh and so can't stay there. IF they accept ACL's gracious offer to play there then they are accepting to opposite of what they have set up with the FL in so much as to say the company in admin CCFC ltd are not the same entity whatsoever. Accepting...

here we go again. 'Bring on admin'? like it was the golden goose!

As I said earlier best two strikers and defenders are missing and a new manager looking to change things at this stage adds up to this kind of late season nonsense. I need not tell you the sense of defeat that will be over the club given this and the current plight off the field. Everyone...

Yes I certainly agree with that. Just to show you I can agree with you!

NO It's a fact at the moment, not my point of view. At least you now have said 'you think' which changes the tone completely. Before you were stating it as fact and that is where my objection is - not just with you here but many other posters who refuse to accept what is for what they assume...

You fail to understand what you are writing. I'm not taking any 'shit' out on anyone. You are stating things that are not true. How have the playoffs been taken from the players? Only the players can do that themselves. If you are inferring a - 10 point deduction then that is not fact and may...

This is a typical non factual post that creates insightfulness. Absolute tosh. :mad:

If Bell is fit then bring him on. He should have been on for baker anyway - straight swap!

Results all going our way today so far. Will that penalty signify the end of our chances? I hope not but this first 45 mins has been uninspiring after that miss. Knowing what's at stake I expect us to come out second half on the front foot.