Search results

Well, Donny pay 100k on their rent ( http://www.thebusinessdesk.com/yorkshire/news/352154-rovers-agree-keepmoat-lease-deal.html?news_section=7 )Colchester 300k and Walsall 470k the average is in this small sample is 290k, leaving MK dons (I cannot find their lease) and other clubs which I...

So you'd rather we say "wanker"? Because that's better English :facepalm: or for you, fail. They're called emoticons, to show your emotions at a statement, would you say "happy" for a smile? Over the Internet I can be a director of Apple... You might be a big shot on SBT, but behind your...

Put up, or shut? Ok... Hull, 5k rent, Ipswich, 30k (moved down from 115k), Swansea AND Ospreys, £0! All leagues above us, and more successful over past 5years. Oh, and we're nearly pay (CCFC 1.28m, Man City 3m) 50% of the rent Man City do... Show me this thread and I'll be MORE than...

You have got to be the biggest hypocrite here. A) I worked yesterday, and had school, and fit in homework im between and after, I'm not moaning, nor making excuses, you tried to undermine me, but it backfired. B) I'm well aware we're in L1, but I don't think L1 is fair on ACL, as it is...

A) take the recent offer from ACL B) get a better deal using renegade tactics? I'd go for B.

I'm sorry, but McG won't go to another L1 club! Bailey, prob true. Wood, not true.

... And the other owners... SISU are from exempt, but far from being the only party accountable for this mess.

We're paying no rent, ut we are contracted to pay 1.2. 1.03 is 1,030,000, so 1.2m - 1.03m = 170k! You idiot, 1.2m - 1.003 = 197k! You clearly didn't do well in maths, nor have a calculator nor know how to use one :jerkit: because of this calculation, your whole comment is now void I put a ? By...

Indeed, but it is still a 'scare tactic', ACL should know it's a bluff and it's unviable in many ways etc.

That's not the question - which deal would you prefer!?

The deal offered is decent tbf, I'll admit that, but at the time we got offered 50% the majority said we should've took it*, 4-5 months later they offer 67%, more uproar... If the trend continues we could get a deal that suits CCFC, don't we all want the best deal for CCFC? Serious question...

Funny how people are calling TF an imbecile etc. but realistically it isn't a viable option, anyway, there are better options locally (Nuneaton). This is a scare tactic, and for people to take it in and treatit with such seriousness, they are the imbeciles. We aren't moving out of the RICOH.

I was replying to OSB, who said their priorities are: RICOH 1st, CCFC 2nd, (could be true) and if they got the RICOH, they wouldn't support CCFC and wouldn't go on a prem drive... That's why I said for 100% share we'd have to be in the prem, 50% share is max they can get, and that wouldn't make...

You don't though do, hence why you want ACL to beat CCFC.

But hey wouldn't be able to purchase 100% of the stadium until they got into the prem :thinking about: 50% yes, but whilst we linger in L1, they would take a long, long time to make a return in profit.

You say I'm stupid to believe in SISU propaganda... A) I haven't spouted any SISU facts B) I'm comparing our rent to others. Fact is, we pay 1.2m rent, or was that made up by SISU :thinking about: fact, Swansea don't pay rent, we pay 1.2m, fact, we pay just under half the rent THE RICHEST...

It wasn't in the master plan to be where we are, the expectations was to get promoted ASAP, so therefore, the rent wasn't an issue at 1st. Now it is, (for some time actually) we have to do something about it, for the survival of CCFC.

I don't think we'll profit, but if rent was cut to say 300k and we get promoted - who knows we may break even, or NOT make a significant loss? Thing is, it's ok to make a loss, as long there're gains to be made elsewhere e.g. TV money, and so on.

Thy are, we've paid 6.7m of rent (owed 7.7), too much, either way, the debt will paid, just a longer time, 1.2m a year is too much and puts the survival of CCFC very much at risk.