Search results

. You're defending Starmers decision not to use his first few weeks in office to lift thousands of children out of poverty. It's really not difficult, or apparently it is (y)

It should have been in there in the first place.

PVA hasn never heard of Clement Attlee

Who's wrong about it? People are saying it should have been in the Kings speech, that won't be altered by lifting it in Autumn, though better late than never

Trying to amend bills is show? If I look back to Labour's amendment to the Gaza bill proposed by the SNP what am I going to find you saying?

Those bloody corbynites, wanting to lift children out of poverty.

Fair play to Sultana, I thought she might be a thorn in Starmers side but I didn't expect it this early into his tenure. Feel a bit guilty for not voting for her now.

Pray for Ben

That was my point! Two bits of dispiriting news in a matter of minutes

Good old City!

Saddlebrains can be a dick at times but there's no need for that

Not helping themselves are they?

Trumpbappe

Yes, though I'd bet its not true.

I heard he failed a medical though I personally think thats bollocks

Was just a joke wasn't it?

Im not sure the fan base that used to taunt the police with songs about the Yorkshire Ripper will be too bothered mate!

No amount of anything on a football forum is changing anything. Whether it's US politics or either we should play 4 at the back! But you're right, and I said it on the election thread, Starmer has to be perceived as getting it right on immigration.

Nice one for trying to have a proper debate. This article, while critical of Biden doesn't dispute the 15 million figure though there are several caveats, one of which is recovered jobs as you mentioned...

Or a 78 year old! It's asking for trouble.