It will be the associated wage bill and terms of contracts that will be the potential issue rather than the outlay.
I don't think that's something King won't plan for however.
I still think, in 20 years time, Luton will look on their approach and their new ground and think they got it right despite that relegation.
Football fans are very focused on the short term, but sometimes a bit of longer term thinking is required.
No one would, but spending big doesn't guarantee that you wont.
Lowest spenders of the 3 that came down was Leicester, 91 million.
There probably is an amount that guarantees staying up, but I'd imagine it, and the associated wage bill, are astronomical.
Looking at teams that have gone up, whether they've stayed or being relegated, there's been a lot of use of the loan market.
It's something we definitely should look to utilise.
And that's it really, there are so many factors involved in staying up, throwing money about offers no guarantees of anything, all I'm saying is, if the worse happens, have a solid contingency plan, which to be fair, I think King will.
Rolled the dice.Their net spend last season was over 120 mil.
Forests was over 140.
Though Forest got docked points for their spending spree last season, so along with the reasons I outlined earlier, not sure they're a great example.