Search results

Doesn't really change anything for me really this statement. I still work on the basis that until the work starts I'm not assuming anything but would urge everyone to get 100% behind Fisher. Give him enough rope ...

Depends on the figures surely. 50% of £5 is better than 100% of £1.

Pretty much all the local media were reporting it to be a very close vote. Certainly the CT and CWR.

You don't think he's an idiot but you think he's spending time evaluating a groundshare with CCFC while insisting on a playing surface we couldn't use?

You don't need to, that's not what he's said. He's selected his language very precisely. As long as he and CRFC only deal with the club he's not dealing with SISU even if they are pulling the strings in the background. Carefully selected wording so he doesn't piss off the council if a plan not...

What has always appeared odd to me was that going in to the meeting it was said to be very close. Then there was a meeting, with Wasps in attendance, at which no minutes or record of any sort was kept. After that it was suddenly a unanimous vote. What the hell happened in that meeting?

sub lease at a guess.

I doubt Sharp is an idiot so if one of the options under consideration is CCFC playing there he will be aware of the pitch requirements. SISU don't need to leave for them not to be involved at least technically. The precise way he's phrased it, several times now, makes me think it is deliberate.

not if CRFC have 51% of the prop co

Exactly, set up a joint venture prop co owned by Otium and CRFC. He's not dealing with SISU then.

Think you can read it either way you want. If it was a non-starter it would be a short statement saying Fisher is full of BS and there's no chance of it happening. What he actually says is that a groundshare with CCFC is one of the options under consideration but there are, quite rightly...

You would have thought so. What use is we won't go to mediation unless you agree to our terms before we start!

Yep, back in September. Said if SISU paid the council £325 it could help.

CCC playing right into SISU's hands.

Its great how he lifts stories from here and the Observer and then claims them as exclusives!

How was CCC refusing to even consider CCFC owning a stake in the stadium prior to SISU coming in a consequence of stunts pulled by SISU?

The original condition had to be removed as it forbid all football, not that the condition was ever enforced. If the condition was still in place Cov Utd couldn't play there. It was when the condition was being altered that CCC wanted to add a clause to prevent professional football. When that...

Come on, you have to be blind not to see the council fall over themselves to assist Wasps and do the very minimum they can legally get away with when it comes to us.

That's not a planning issue. That's a restriction the council tried, and failed, to have added to the BPA lease when ownership was transferred recently to Jon Sharp / CRFC.

They've had to take out an overdraft and had a loan put in by the owner which doesn't sound like they're sat on a huge pile of money.