Search results

And that was split equally across all the images? Can't find the Telegraph piece, the only one that comes up is Billboard highlighting CCFC's plight on the Ricoh's doorstep which concentrates on 6 and Out with no mention of any messages against the council or Wasps. Hence why I asked...

Sure its complete coincidence that now this information is coming out the trust have adopted a stance of ignoring everything that happened in the past.

Boycotted last time, would get a season ticket this time.

Out of interest could someone at the trust tell us how many times each image was featured on the big screen and at what times? Also if this was communicated to the press in the same manner other trust action is. Don't like to be suspicious but this seems to have not registered with the CT or...

Christ, Gilbert and armybike are like a couple of upset kids at primary school. Good to see they're concentrating on the important issues.

That's a brilliant reply, fair play to whoever does the clubs social media these days. They have to deal with some shit but never seem to lose their cool.

Wasn't Labour supposed to be wiped out? They've put a remain supporter in a leave seat and still won.

Interesting that Duggins didn't even attempt to answer the question regarding talks between the council, Hoffman & Elliott, and Wasps in the last two months. Surely an easy thing to deny. Was also asked to categorically state they are against a non league phoenix club playing at the Ricoh...

How difficult is it for the council to answer very clear questions? Seemingly impossible as their response doesn't even attempt at answer the questions asked. Are they just copy and pasting the same answer every time?

I don't think any of the examples you've given remotely compares to being racially abused. As for punishments for clubs it depends how seriously the clubs are taking the problem and what they are doing to try and stop it. With the recent England game the comment was made they will get a fine...

I know SISU are incompetent but doesn't anyone really believe their legal team have had this email for years and its never got a mention in court?

Why would we stay out of the city if the imaginary stadium project was moving forward? That would mean SISUs conditions to drop the legal action had been met. Are you suggesting that if the legal action was dropped Wasps still wouldn't offer us an acceptable deal?

No I don't which is why I want them called out on it. Expose them instead of dicking around giving them an ever increasing amount of ammunition to take to the EFL.

I would have thought most people on here would be bothered about the situation our club finds itself in. Think you'll find you're in a very small group in not caring about it or wanting it to be resolved as quickly as possible.

I've made it as simple as possible for you by laying out every way it could have been dealt with and shown how the way the council have chosen to go both plays in to SISUs hands and draws the whole thing out the longest. Which part is it you are struggling to comprehend?

I couldn't care less what SISU did or didn't now. What I want is this whole thing to come to a close and the council pissing around is doing nothing but draw things out.

Nope, it seems like the command has been sent out to just keep hammering on about planning and hope no difficult questions get asked of the council.

As you keep ignoring the question I'm going to assume you don't actually have any figures. Nobody is 'going RFC'. It is because of what happened last time I want the council to not dick about. I want this drawn to a conclusion as quickly as possible. Let me make it as simple as possible for...

A few posts back it was going to cost a fortune to build at Woodlands because of what's on the site now its greenfield! As I suggested previously look at the costs shown on the Trust website. Look when the money was spent and look when the decontamination was carried out as the decontamination...

Again, why the expectation that the football club should have to follow a different procedure, and as a consequence cost, to everyone else? You seem to be reveling in the fact the council are 'getting one over' on SISU but all they are doing in reality is giving SISU more evidence to hand to the...