Search results

Guess its something that's filtered down from the Prem. Some of them may well be paid for by the club as some are training at Ryton.

And no discussion ever seems to mention that if we end up having to pay the cost of a stadium build over the next 50 years is that better or worse than paying rent for the next 50 years and have nothing to show for it. People talk like its go and burn £50m and have nothing to show for it.

You've got to assume that its the owners insisting on the prominence of the &. Can't believe they've been through a design process twice and had professional advise it was the best option.

How many years ago did Fisher start banging on about a new stadium? Why have the trust waited until now to do this. Is it a coincidence that it comes not long after Duggins dropped the council in the shit by admitted the club had enquired about council owned land.

They're able to that as the local council issued compiulsary purchase orders for land around the proposed stadium. Imagine that, a council assisting the local football club.

Normally the last week in June, was later last year because of the play offs extending the season. From looking at social media seems a few of them have hired their own coaches and are already getting ready for the season.

That was back in the late 90s wasn't it? Seem to recall the local council provided assistance to keep them in Bedford.

Somehow, despite low expectations, the trust always manage to fall below them. This is the most pointless article I've ever read. Two accountants and a surveyor, who it appears have so little faith in what they have produced they haven't actually put their names to it, have literally dreamed up...

That looks much better. Still don't get why they want a logo where the dominant feature is the & rather than the name of their company but that's up to them. Will have to be quite small to fit the width of a shirt.

Because most of our sponsors have blended in pretty well with the kit. We had one year with the green / yellow city link logo before it was changed to white and one year with that charity logo. The Allsopp and Allsopp one looks terrible on the shirts, a big dark blue square and & symbol...

Mark Field isn't having the best day either. Sure they'll do everything they can to keep him in his seat rather than trigger a by-election there as well.

Well that's the new kit ruined.

Birmingham Council :jawdrop:

Midrepro was announced as a one year deal so that's expired now.

not heard any rumours, any guesses?

Yet in 2012 Richardson was talking to Rossborough about Wasps merging with CRFC and moving to the Ricoh.

Now that they have the club running day to day in a much better fashion than when they took over if we could get promotion to the Championship we'd be an attractive takeover prospect. Of course that would require the ground issue to be resolved which doesn't seem likely anytime soon.

I find it very hard to believe the two aren't related. `Are we supposed to believe that ACL, without the knowledge of CCC, were talking to Wasps about buying them while at the same time Wasps future owner was talking to CRFC about moving a team to the Ricoh neither of which had anything to do...

I suspect that rather than being money left on the table the level of sales doesn't justify the manufacture. How many clubs outside the big PL sides have a bespoke kit that is available in a different cut for women? Seem to recall when we were with Puma and had bespoke kits the club had to make...

Oddly that seems to have been missed. I don't think they have ever addressed that since it first came out in one of the court cases. If it was the correct course of action and justifiable why not give an explanation.