Search results

Can't say I've really seen anyone take everything SISU say at face value. Although we do seem to have gone back to people picking out individual comments made by Fisher to justify the actions of the council and Wasps.

Not really the same is it. Wasps repeated the same requirement over and over again for months on every statement. SISU agreed to those requirements. Every statement from Wasps since SISU agreed to the requirements has contained different requirements. Its not hard to see.

The 'it's not legal action' argument may not wash with you personally but it is factually correct. And that's before you even consider any EC action will be against CCC not Wasps.

Are you not reading what Wasps previously claimed? Here again is their statement from 29th March 2019

The conflict is Wasps with themselves, just go back and read their statements. Originally they were about legal action being halted. Compare what they were saying before to what they are saying now. Here's one example which was as recently as March this year. That condition has been met. There...

Not really. The original requirement of Wasps was that SISU / CCFC stop all legal action against them. That was agreed to and SISU signed the undertaking. Wasps then changed their requirements to no action being taken by anyone against Wasps or third parties regarding the Ricoh. That is a...

Yes. It is hugely unlikely, even if we crash out with no deal, that cases like this will just be dropped.

Council will have, or at least should have, insurance for this kind of thing.

Would depend if the agreement fell away when Wasps wouldn't agree a new deal. If it did then frankly Wasps have only got themselves to blame if legal action is launched against them.

We're not the first club to have to do this and it hasn't led to franchise football so I don't think thats a worry. Its simply doesn't make business sense for clubs to move around the county. Where are all these cities without teams they could move to? You really need to flip it round and look...

Some of their fans genuinely think they lose money by having us play there. Their inability to grasp very basic facts is astounding.

This ones easy. There's 365 days in the year. We played 24 games last season - some moved to Fridays or Sundays to allow other events, Wasps played 16. 3 concerts and 1 monster truck event. What was happening on the remaining 321 days as I assume they were all fully booked if they need our days...

Well no it would be state aid to ACL. Are you suggesting Chris West is talking bollocks?

Have a look at their accounts: Wasps Bonds

Beat advert for the Womens World Cup has been the Nations League Finals. Load of players who couldn't give a shit and would rather be on the beach.

The Coventry public. Even if you hate the football club for some reason as a taxpayer you'd want the best return possible.

Last time was very different. There was a stadium sat empty and people, wrongly it turned out, assumed moving clubs around the country wasn't an option.

I think people would be wise to the fact The Ricoh was available again and therefore the council would be under pressure to properly market it with everyone bidding on the same thing. Certainly don't think they'd get away with conducting a sale in secret again.