Search results

I agree it’s very unfashionable but it might suit the players we currently have ….

No but I know enough about football to know Palmer will find another club easily. If they agreed with you they would accept the City offer.

No he played as a striker throughout his youth career. Like many young strikers he was thought to be too lightweight when he first broke into the senior team and played out wide whilst ge adjusted to men’s football.

Which is why you are not an agent.

I expect we will seek to sell him if an extension cant be agreed …

He clearly has a market value regardless of whether or not you rate him. I'm not a huge fan but others are, most notably Oggy who appears president of his fan club ….

To protect our position rather than him leave for free

I think the actual rumour is that he has declined the terms offered rather than he is not interested in staying longer ….

@Saddlebrains does get some good snippets. Not everything proves to be correct but that’s ok isn’t it ?

Why ? We announced Da Silva on a bosman on May 30th last year.

For those worrying about transfer progress remember that Boddy said in his farewell interview that the best player we failed to sign during his tenure was James Collins…. Let that sink in for those questioning our current transfer policy …..

To be fair Wright himself said he had to learn the position this season as it was new to him. Henry attacked from the left Vik attacked from the left Neither were wide left players …..

It’s a new Wum account …

Robins confirmed at the time we were “trying to sign a player that would normally be well out of our reach but you never know …..” I don’t believe he was referring to EMC

How is this on topic ?

Or how about after 20 years of getting by we actually just enjoy it ??

I think we are very lucky that Robins is unfashionable and bigger clubs increasingly chase a name and not a track record …. That said Robins needs to perform given the squad we have. King will judge him on that and so will the fans …. That’s elite sport.

Let’s say for the sake of argument there are legitimate worries. What would your better alternative plan be ?

But you have zero evidence of the rumours your mate gives you but you still believe them and indeed defend them. Why is factual evidence now so important ?

You have zero evidence of that. The Vik and Hamer fees were not a windfall but rather assets that were valued in the transaction. If King got more than the sale valuation then that is to his credit ….