Search results

If Norwich have a percentage sell on clause we might be due our own sell-on percentage of that.

To be honest most of that describes De Gea to me.

Beat me to it!

Would have to change the formation back to two up. Dunno about the one behind playing in the hole though.

There was a point where he looked like a Lego man who'd had his wish to become a real boy come true. Pinocchilego. *if that's used as part of the Lego movie franchise I am claiming copyright and royalties.

NO! It should have a FlagBrit Brexit means Brexit!

With the tree I'd have thought that's be absolutely fine. Probably better as it'll keep the moisture in the soil better. As long as the spots not too near the house with the roots etc.

Don't think it needs the 1883 as it's not related to the people featured.

Yep. I can handle mistakes. This is something that hasn't been seen for generations so it's largely uncharted territory. Mistakes will inevitably be made. If they said 'we've made some mistakes but we're learning from them to improve our response' I could give them more leeway. (Of course the...

You moan and bitch every time we don't loosen restrictions, it’s clear you want us to reopen no matter how many people lose their lives

Oooh, who might it be....

I agree it should've been more open to improve value. Of course it could've gone the other way that Wasps said they would pull out if they did and that would've totally negated the competitive element and reduced the value of the stadium to less than what Wasps were willing to pay. SISU sure as...

Think he's coming back from an AOL injury.

Another possiblity would be to take an image of Mt Rushmore and superimpose the managers faces onto it (would obv require a professional touch)

Fair enough. I'm just a fan of symmetry.

Obv there were differences in the deal (leasehold term being the main one) and there is the issue of what SISU actually wanted kept on getting bigger. First fair rent, then rent with FB money, then unencumbered leasehold, then the freehold. Point was that those saying "I'd refuse to deal with...

Because Starmer actually was attentive to his job before getting into politics. Johnson has always been a chancer in it for the shits and giggles.

To me that says 1m is only acceptable due to economic pressures not health and safety. So 1m is not safe but we value the economy more than the lives of our citizens.

Not a priority position. Can't see us spending money on a CB unless it's someone Championship or above.

When did we sign him?