Search results

Couldn't you have claimed some of that off whoever did the survey that they missed this stuff?

Good point. Also with people living longer people aren't even inheriting until later as well. There is a bit swings-and-roundabouts though because even though those people are 'turning right' later the fact their living longer means they still remain right wing voters for about the same amount...

I get you. Guess it'll be like a big game in first come first served or having some sort of ballot. Once you've taken ST holders into account you probably won't have much left.

We could be leading the way as a green stadium if the uni wanted to incorporate thier technology to showcase it, like the energy generating flooring they were working on.

Well if they wanted to do that they could just take a year off the contract in the depreciation calculation. They could still get a small fee in the summer of their final year and as you would only have to adjust the asset value by the difference of the amount received against realisable value...

Work out how many seats that is and distancing required. On the system put all other seats as sold/unavailable before allowing people/office staff to take bookings and no-one can accidentally overbook the seats.

I think so. It would certainly be the most sensible way of doing it using S/L method.

I'd quite like that. I'd be reclaiming it already. Just don't start a female team and call them the Seattle Heroines! Although they could then start a mixed team called the Seattle Speedballs.

Think it'd be a bit wierd if we had visit Cov on the shirt if we were still in Brum! Wouldn't be affordable for them but City of Culture somewhere on it would be good. Maybe a small one on the back of the collar?

A survey should be part of the selling process so you've effectively got a 'guarantee' on certain aspects of the structure. So many I know have moved in then found stuff that needed doing. I'm all for every house needing surveying periodically (say 20-25 years) if it isn't sold to ensure it's...

I get your point in terms of competitiveness as everyone wold be doing it at the same time, as they did with Bosman. But it does have a massive effect on their solvency if you're suddenly writing down/ off huge swathes of assets on the balance sheets. Exterior lenders and creditors would get a...

If you really like the other place more go for it instead. It's a long term decision you'll be living in for years so ultimately it has to be what will make you happy rather than what you feel to be a moral obligation. If you go through with the current one knowing you could have had somewhere...

Thought Johnson would be more a Dyson man, what with Brexit. Or a Hooray Henry Hoover.

Beat me to it!

He's not Megan Fox

Unless his attitude is affecting the other players and squad cohesiveness I'm fine with keeping people involved. Maybe he isn't the hardest worker in the world (I don't know) but that doesn't instantly mean he's disruptive. Maybe infuriating because others think he could be doing better but it...

Agree entirely. Fixes more problems than anything else IMO - hoarding of talent, gulf between top clubs and the rest, ability of youngsters to get competitive games, increase in overall ability of the leagues (and thus hopefully national team). It HAS to come in eventually.

But big players will choose to be released. They quickly get another big contract. But in doing so the club will have to forego transfer fees so although it gets the wage bill down it could result in an immediate significant 'loss' on the balance sheet. Paying transfer fees would become a very...

Didn't realise you were adding a squad cap in as well.

I agree about using a property as your main home. It's an 'essential' and so tax so be minimal if any at all. There needs to be a skewing of the market in favour of first homes against BTL/second homes which tax should cover but it'd be so difficult to police. Second homes would be bought in...