Search results

You know what would be easiest then? If you don't think the polls any good, just don't post on it? It's fairly simple.

I'm not writing a journal entry with the results. I'm confident most people are taking a sensible approach to what viable means and they know the circumstances won't change anytime soon.

Well for a start I haven't said it would be better in every way? Why do I need to give an example? Most know what's going on. I haven't said in a perfect world etc, so nothing would change ownership-wise, council-wise etc etc. make your own mind up.

Have a look at the poll. I'd say people aren't convinced. It boils down to whether they also think the Ricoh is viable, whether they think wasps will move on at some point and if it's worth waiting it out. There you go, a couple of things for you to think about.

Christ, it's about thinking for yourself. I'm not going to write every detail. So what if viable means something different to everyone, it's meant to be ambiguous. I think most people realise though that viable, in this case, means close enough to the city to not make much difference. Like I...

See statement above. Not thinking for yourself is poor, in my opinion.

That's the point. It's your opinion. You make up your mind what viable is. I'm not here to bottle feed you.

I think if I were to choose players since we dropped out the Prem I'd go for Thompson, Safri and Mifsud. But they're nowhere near my favourites ever

Froggatt - nice one, forgot about him! Such an exciting player. Nicky Summerbee deserved shooting for that.

Dublin or Huckerby for me. Together they were a great partnership.

"There were many"... That doesn't really say much. We didn't own HR. Richardson sold that in 97 or 98, when there was a chance to expand and renovate it. I think most, before HR was sold up, would probably have wanted that. However, we were never given that choice. So are we not just on about...

Who begged to leave HR?! It's a silly comment. Mainly because it's a throwaway remark trying to firm up your own opinion.

Tell me how it's not quite? Because you didn't actually say SISU? Who were you referring to if it wasn't the owners?

Yes, one where you've asked SISU to be savvy and business minded, and the other saying all parties (which I assume, one of them, was SISU) are thick.

Well done for not realising I was agreeing with you :claping hands:

I'd agree, but I feel you're first quote may scupper that ideal scenario

Sadly, this is probably true. Just thought it would be interesting to get some sort of an idea. You can never tell from just reading around posts on here.

It's a theoretical situation. I asked it because I can't see Wasps selling any part of the Ricoh to SISU and therefore, the best option, in my opinion, seems to be having our own new stadium! It's also upto people what they consider to be viable, but I'd suggest within 5 miles of the city centre.

If you look at the question. Like I said, not a question of logistics or the finer details.

I literally just want to get an idea what percentage of people will say yes to leaving and how many will say no. For the benefit of those that like to rant that it will never happen, this isn't for that. It's a simple yes or no. I'm firmly in the yes.