Search results

So true the light at the end of our tunnel has never been sunshine, without fail it's always been a train ready to squash us into the tracks.

You should do stand up, there doesn't seem to be a current comedian focused on grammar or spelling, perhaps thats your niche

Spelling humour truly the tool of a razor sharp wit.

No they are not funding the club they are borrowing money to use to fund the club this money has to be paid back and with big interest + management fees. The actual total value of the club falls every day and has done since they took over, we owe more and more as time goes on. They arn't funding...

Tim Fisher has made many contradictions compared to what has come out in the wash, other people than you call this lieing.

I think you are being unreasonable, he has only had 2 months at £345 an hour with lawyers on similar money and a team of assistants, we can't expect him to be as on the ball as our 2 of our forum posters.

wow:facepalm:

Imagine the excitement and optimism we could have in 2 weeks time, or it could be utter despair.

Not constructive but completely understandable, if you spent a year negotiating only to find out you were the only people actually negotiating and the other party was just stalling for time so they could distress you, surely you wouldn't then be open to negotiate again. Especially as if sisu...

Couldn't they just have liquidated instead of putting limited in admin in the first place if they were going to do that? Also if sisu buy limited at full value to stop others are they going to have to put in 70 million ? while much of it goes back to themselves, doesn't it make holdings debt...

Should the worst happen and SISU buy Limited do they then have a contract with ACL to use the Ricoh with a rent of 1.2mill and the requirement to top up the escrow account weather they like it or not?

Sorry, People have been referring to Fisher as a C word, The Labia is a part of the vagina, so he asked was Fisher there and you said no labia is there instead, so I thought, same thing then.

:laugh: ignore me I just have a filthy mind.

You've seen right that they have put in about 30 mill and now we owe them 70, if the money comes from their investors its not any different to a mortgage really, we are still paying massive interest. 12k and extending is too small. Extending is much more expensive than just building to the...

2.36 million a year on a 7% mortgage over 20 years. The numbers showed its a stupid idea at 3% and 25 years and it just gets worse and worse the more we deviate from that.

Sure but I find it best show the figures don't work even in a best case scenario, if I demonstrated it at 5%, I'd soon have to be defending against the post saying well I'm sure they could do it cheaper than that.

Tiny, Warm and more monkeys than the Coventry city board/ex board

Are those contradictory? I agree with both of them, Obviously by an order of magnitude the first scenario is best but should the worst happen and we are stuck with sisu then the second option needs to happen or the club is dead.

Stay where we are, a new stadium would be too small for big games, and cost more. I've said this multiple times before but a 3% mortgage of 25million pounds is 1.4million a year (over 25 years), so if you compare that to a 400k rent then the club needs to bring in 1million a year in food and...

It's indicative for sure, but of course does not tell the entire story, but if this goes ahead and we got 17.3k in 2010 and 3.4k in 2014 then sure from that alone you could judge if the ownership had been successful or not, (hint for you, not so much)