Search results

  1. N

    I agreed with alot what fisher said last night

    If CCFC could immediately move into a new stadium 20k+ that it owned and the cost for doing so with mortgage payments or rent or whatever was under about 500k then yes this would be the best scenario. However since none of that is possible it turns out for multiple reasons that despite the...
  2. N

    I agreed with alot what fisher said last night

    It's already been asked last night, there is no need for he said she said as it was on the radio, fisher was told by a member of the sky blue trust that acl have agreed to meet with fisher next week if fisher was willing and he was not.
  3. N

    Forum..

    it was crystal clear his answer was no, but he didnt actual outright say no, which is no surprise he hardly answered the questions asked to him all evening.
  4. N

    Forum..

    Someone from the trust said they have an agreement to meet sisu next week if tim fisher is willing, they asked him the question, his answer while not actually saying it was no, he said he didn't believe they would meet and he said if they are willing to meet then its just a delaying tactic...
  5. N

    Forum..

    So then sky blue taylor there you go acl said they would meet with sisu brokered by the skyblue trust and fisher says no.
  6. N

    Forum..

    well done Stuart Linnell :-) good man
  7. N

    'Hunger strike' threatened by Cov fan

    it would not force sisu to liquidate, it might force them to sell and since it appears we have a couple of viable options there thats a good scenario. why would sisu liquidate and get nothing when they could sell and get something? The simply fact of the matter is going to the ground and...
  8. N

    Forum Questions that could be asked

    someone going should print out 50 copies of that and hand it out, makes sure the questions asked are good ones.
  9. N

    Cwr tomorrow

    pretty much yes, it's just important you dont allow someone to not answer a question while looking like they have, if someone isn't going to give a straight answer that needs to be obvious to everyone thats whats happened, fisher has been allowed to dish out his misleading spin to thousands of...
  10. N

    Cwr tomorrow

    This is your chance to win back the respect of all the Coventry fans, all you have to do is make sure Tim Fisher answers the questions, Listen to the question asked, listen to his response, did he answer the question? or did he just spin, if the later say Tim thanks for that but I'm afraid I...
  11. N

    crimes against football

    If they were they would be just as criminal as sisu in my eyes, I have no love for acl. we know for a fact sisu are the bad guys, the council and acl the jury is out on imo.
  12. N

    crimes against football

    yes because they had threatened liquidation and had spent the last year trying to distress acl despite the fact that fisher never posturers he does business in good faith always. You know this
  13. N

    So where would we be better off

    Once you lose people you have to win them back, simply removing the thing that caused them to stop going will win some back but others will need greater incentives. people will have found different things to do on a saturday, some people won't know the players anymore (and the ammount of turn...
  14. N

    crimes against football

    seriously, half of its already happened, the next bit has been outright promised by our owners and the final bit is the logical conclusion of 3 to 5 years with the lowest playing budget in the league due to ffp calculations and a tiny crowd, no corporate, little advertising income. How on earth...
  15. N

    crimes against football

    sure but there is no benefit in hiring a good manager if you can't keep them for 6 months because of your other actions and then get the points the good manager earns taken off him, prevent the good manager from buying new players and building a squad with constant embargos, have no where for...
  16. N

    crimes against football

    yes I was responding to someone saying they prefer to have sisu over the venkys, in a situation where thats the choice give me the venkys, thats not a pro venky argument. You are looking at my post out of context if you aren't reading what I quoted.
  17. N

    crimes against football

    whose pro venky? I'm saying that nutty appoints of a new manager every few months doesn't in any way compare with sisus current actions they have clearly been planning for the last couple of years. I'd prefer to have my wallet stolen and be punched in the face over being raped and murdered but...
  18. N

    crimes against football

    they happily crush people and companies, they have no morals, they lie, cheat and mislead, it's evil as far as i'm concerned, that's not to say there isn't much greater levels of evil in the world because of cause there is, much much greater. But I'm happy to comprise on stingy, inept, morally...
  19. N

    crimes against football

    appoint a decent manager, scare him off after a few months because he can see the club is about to go to shit, then put the club into administration, then move them to wallsall, or nutty appointments of a new manager every few months. Give me the venkys, I doubt they will soon be in league one...
  20. N

    crimes against football

    our owners are not just stingy and inept they are evil lying schemers.
Top