Search results

I don't like CCC but I'm absolutely thrilled.

The first person jumped the barriers this weeked, hundreds did not follow.

if you want a game where everyone invades the pitch do it at an away game, then you won't be giving money to sisu, it will still make the news just as well. if you can't convince 1.5k people to do it an away game you have zero chance of first convincing 6k people to go to sixfields then convince...

Taking us for a nice long trip to Northampton, not the usual holiday or celebration destination but at least it will be quiet and peaceful in the stands.

The bomb squad is the definition of free wheeling through a contract, they don't have to do anything for their money.

good point well made, like you say though unlikely to be the case especially with so many players, if it had been just one or two that would have been a more likely scenario.

there is issues with excluding them and I have already explained them too you, there is also the case that the players if they were training with the squad could impress pressley and get back into his plans. Like the fact he brought Jordan Clark back and while you might think we don't need them...

This is hugely flawed, you think we don't want these players thus bombsquad = good. these players are overpaid thus bombsquad = good. Neither of these things are solved by the bombsquad, in fact it hinders fixing those things and comes with the downside that we can't use the centre backs that we...

The players are needed as it stands though, the bomb squad makes no sense, it makes it less likely we will get the players off the books as we wish too who wants a player who can't even break into a squad full of kids as well as them being less able to slot straight into a new team due to...

the bomb squad in principle is not 100% it's ridiculous, one of the stupidest things I've seen from our club, we are still paying their expensive wages, we are less likely to offload them when they are being treated like this, without them being match fit and without them being in the shop...

I don't think the best possible manager has a squad that is too small whilst keeping a sub squad of players he won't let near the squad. But thats the problem with delusion presumably he was told, we're selling off these players so no need to keep them with the squad and you can bring in a load...

I assume thats a reference to SP not being a ccfc fan but thats just unhelpful semantics. My point was clear.

Positive mental attitude = the embargo is going to stop us signing anyone, we're going to have to make do with what we've got. thats ok, we've got a great bunch of lads and some young talent ready to be molded into great players, lets do this. Delusion = we need 7 more players will have them in...

Wigan sky blue is correct, he's a grammar nazi with very odd sense of what is important but he's correct all the same. Math - maths both are short for mathematics, I personally feel math sounds better than maths in the context you used it but it is an Americanism.

If they leave someone will buy them, they will move us back to the Ricoh and likely start to purchase it, they will get a shirt sponsor, they will start selling shirts. Our Crowds will shoot back up, we will probably still get relegated but from next season we can start the process of moving...

Ok listened to it, his response to that wasn't really wishy washy at all, I was mistaken sorry. His response to the question about weather far more than the golden share in limited and weather players, gate receipts etc were in limited was wishy washy though, his responce was I don't think so...

Agreed and while he might technically be an independent director it would of course be ludicrous to consider him independent and without a vested interest. I'll see if I can find his actual answer to what we were talking about, I do agree with you that I think he said he was there.

http://twohundredpercent.net/?p=23866 if you are using chrome I found the article didn't appear for me untill I used internet explorer. seems to be there for me now with chrome though.

was it specifically denied by Labovich? or was it wishy washy denied by Labovich with words like I don't think so, or I didn't witness that, or I don't believe so. I thought he answered a few questions where he should have been using the word no with answers like that. I didn't believe him...