Search results

Only way for ACL to stop it would be to have a penalty clause that said if ccfc build a new stadium and stop paying home games here then a charge of 5 mill becomes payable. But they arn't in the position to demand this and as I said there is an easy way to make the contract that works for...

Who says ACL wouldn't allow it? I don't think they are in any position to turn down a 400k year 10 year deal even if they did believe that ccfc might stop playing there half way through and continue paying the rent. Honestly though it would be very easy to fix the contract to make acl happy with...

There is nothing wrong with being locked down to a long lease overall it is much better for you then playing elsewhere. Simple numbers used but in all cases I'm being generous to SISU with them, the truth supports the lease at the Ricoh much more. 400k rent - 10 year lease. Total cost...

surely you feel exactly the same way though about the fact Fisher is telling us developers are going to be willing to pay for half+ of our stadium for us. It seems to me that is a much less attractive proposition than adding to the Ricoh. I don't really think the economic climate makes either of...

I still feel relegation is likely, we are scoring and conceding for fun but what worries me it's much more likely the goals we are scoring will dry up than we fix the defence, we also have no strength in depth and a likelyhood of losing a couple of important players before the window closes. If...

If they had made it legal though they weren't getting what they wanted, there is of course a very simple solution to that, for sisu to sign an agreement giving them what they wanted at the same time as acl sign the original cva. This solution is so damn obvious that it shows either sisu weren't...

The same as now, not believe they are going to build it, not belive the club will be in a fit state by the time it was built (if they were building it) for us to need a 24k seater stadium we'll be in the conference. For me the problem has never been having a new stadium it's the 5 years of...

if you are going you are going because you want to, you aren't going because someone sent you an e-mail telling you not too, no one knows who you are, they won't know or believe they inspired you to go, it's silly talk to say you are going because you got an e-mail. you are spending 5 hours of...

a hell of alot more than are willing to travel to bedworth to watch them

yep you definitely sound desperate, is it attention you are desperate for? or just a friend

Further than I would like but wouldn't be a deal breaker. Plenty of other deal breakers in the way at the moment though.

He did deny it categorically and he was there. I'm very anti sisu and trust labovitch as far as I can throw him (and I'm badly disabled so thats not at all) so hopefully confirmation from someone on the opposite side of the argument will prevent you having to search for it.

In fact it's better as he could go elsewhere, so either he took a 50% pay cut and then they offered to pay him off 50% of us contract afterwards, ie 50% of the 50%, so 25% or it's just not true.

depends when they asked for it, if they asked early as they were planning a promotion and there is no real downside to asking for more it's the smart thing to do, if the promotion goes well you sell more, if it doesn't no loss

say it again

:thinking about:..........

people shouting Godwins Law as a response rather than arguing against his points are worse than than using a nazi analogy, His point was obvious, his point was fair, it's not like he actually compared sisu to nazis, he shouldn't have used them as an analogy if only for the fact it allows...

because sisu are almost completely to blame, even if acl had said tough you have a contract at over a mill a year we won't negotiate you have to pay it (and they did nothing of the sort and they were a thousand times more reasonable than that) it would still have been sisus fault. Sisu are the...

The sky isn't blue, it just appears that way ;)

If fans brought a 10% share in the club for a pound we would then owe SISU £7 million and end up losing our houses and that doesn't seem smart, or am I misunderstanding?