Search results

And not ponced about with it like Sporting Lisbon

I’m not sure how I would feel about us spending that much money on one player. It would certainly mean Robins is getting almost all of Viks fee, which is great. But it’s a lot to spend on one player. Trust the process I suppose

Just googled it. Only thing I could find was on Wikipedia (so questionable if it’s true!) But it looks like there’s different types. The one I’m thinking of is rail seats, and with those they are locked so you can’t sit in them. But there are other types that can still be sat in so I guess it...

I thought with safe standing the seats are locked in the upright position so it’s impossible to sit in them?

Does this mean there has been progress made on a new, longer rental agreement at the arena? The club will be footing the bill for these changes. Seems an unlikely thing to do if we’re moving out in a few years

This would be a great addition to the ground, and the match day experience. I hope then everyone who wants to stand moves to the corner. I get that some people like standing, but not every can, or wants to stand at a game. Sometimes persistent standers in areas that most people sit is very...

Wolves, Brentford, QPR, Cardiff, Chelsea, Spurs

Then what is the point of owning us? Selling assets to fund losses just results in the club being worth less, and he won’t get his money back

What if he also didn’t want to go?

Well shouldn’t Doug have had a plan for that when buying the club? How would the losses have been funded if Vik didn’t want to leave?

We shouldn’t be funding operating losses with assets sales. Absolutely worst way to run a business. All of that money needs to be used on infrastructure or transfer fees. Nothing else.

The window is more going to be incompetence than anything financial

I thought it was expandable to 20k, but was actually only going to be about 15k initially? Such ambition from our glorious former owners

Hamers staying then?

He’s here for another year if we don’t sell him. Repeating myself here, but how were we buying those 8-10 new players if Gyok broke his leg in the play offs?

It would be bad business. I think disaster is a bit of an exaggeration

That goes both ways though. Any player we buy for a fee would be structured

Which is what we’ll be doing if he stays.

So what was the plan if Gyokeres broke his leg in the play offs?

I can’t believe how quickly some of you lose your bottle. It was generally regarded as fact on here a few weeks ago that for Gyokeres and Hamer we’d get a combined £40m in