Search results

  1. coundonskyblue

    Council tossers

    It is interesting. My thoughts would be to go for CCFC Holdings, which presumably also controls CCFC Ltd? Or can the whole group be put into admin?
  2. coundonskyblue

    Council tossers

    Which is irrelevant as its based on Turnover.
  3. coundonskyblue

    Takeover latest

    Is this 'the most significant CCFC news since the move to the Ricoh'?
  4. coundonskyblue

    Takeover latest

    How does it damage the club?
  5. coundonskyblue

    Council tossers

    Sarcasm my good man. FFP is dropping 5% for everyone as you say. That reduction is going to be just as difficult for our competitors to deal with as us.
  6. coundonskyblue

    Council tossers

    No one denies its a gamble, but when you know something is wrong the worst thing you can do is nothing. Whatever happens in the coming years it will not be as bad as just doing nothing and letting Sisu do it imo.
  7. coundonskyblue

    Council tossers

    Hope. I don't hold with this idea that just because we have had bad owners for the past 20 years the next ones will also be bad. I know its difficult for us City fans, but we shouldn't be so cynical. Not all Football club owners are like Sisu/Richardson/Robinson.
  8. coundonskyblue

    Council tossers

    CCFC received £6m from the Higgs Trust
  9. coundonskyblue

    Council tossers

    Maybe you should have been protesting outside the council house calling on the cabinet to pull the plug?
  10. coundonskyblue

    I long for a fresh start....

    When you've got nothing you have nothing to lose.
  11. coundonskyblue

    Council tossers

    When the council voted in 2003 on whether to go ahead with the project without CCFC, the clubs future hung in the balance. Had the council voted against the project, the club would have been hit with a winding up order the very next day.
  12. coundonskyblue

    43 million and they Fokked it up.

    Try watching Pointless on BBC1. The prizes on there will make you believe your back in the days of Bergerac.
  13. coundonskyblue

    Council tossers

    But this is all caused by the evil ACL apparently. Since last time the rent has been reduced by 67%. If the rent is the cause of it all, we now have a 67% better chance of finding new owners.
  14. coundonskyblue

    Council tossers

    The Council and Higgs trust saved the club in 2003, have you forgot that already?
  15. coundonskyblue

    Council tossers

    Yes but why would they? What would they have to gain from it? Also why would they by the club back just to liquidate it?
  16. coundonskyblue

    Council tossers

    Please stop posting your opinions as fact. I respect your right to an opinion, but you are posting things that you can't possibly know as fact. Nearly 7 Billion people in this world, you can't possibly know all their intentions!
  17. coundonskyblue

    Council tossers

    Well the threat of Liquidation has now passed so surely your pleased?
  18. coundonskyblue

    ACL start admin proceedings

    Just to point out that I wasn't so naive to believe that Sisu had written off their investment.
  19. coundonskyblue

    Council tossers

    So we have nothing to lose then.
  20. coundonskyblue

    Council tossers

    Market rates are determined by supply and demand. Supply: The fact that other club pay less is irrelevant, as none of those venues are an option to CCFC. Like it or lump it but the Ricoh is the only venue that CCFC (in its current form) can play in. Demand: Equally so, CCFC are the only...
Top