Search results

Or is it RFC he knows a lot about what is going on?

That was a close shave!

As I acknowledged. Her main income will be declared in the Cayman Islands where Arvo are based for tax purposes. But they are not the super rich in my opinion.

I have no problem with him taking a holiday. He could still be ploughing through reports and watching footage of players. The reality is he can't buy anyone at the moment, SISU have been focused on the JR.

I appreciate she probably has revenue streams all around the world but according to the last SISU accounts her and Coleman shared less than 400,000. I accept, that is a more than healthy return, but it doesn't put you in the mega rich bracket either.

From a fans perspective his record is dire. From a SISU perspective he has probably delivered what they want pretty well. For a long time Joy was able to keep her anonymity, only recently has she had to come out of the shadows to support, 'we are building a stadium' farce. The OP suggests...

Joy was miffed because she wanted to own the mortgage. Then ACL and CCFC would be paying into the SISU coffers.

Day 3 could still produce the smoking gun. It could be the Judge, who could be RFC! ;-)

Wealthy really? In comparison to who? Never seen her on a rich list.

Nicaraguan hard bean?

I still prefer the big old bundle of papers simply but effectively tied with pink ribbon and a bow, or sky blue ribbon maybe.

Don't be too quick to judge a game at half time.

Once we spoke of Laurent Delorge, Now we speak of law, rent and de fraud.

At least they won't have to talk to each other, silence in court!

Nick can we close this one now, it's more confusion with day 2 thread running, which makes sense to have day 2 thread.

'Not a keyboard lawyer and don't pretend to be'. Nowt wrong with that Houch, in fact it's commendable. We would all like it just to be about football agreed. But this is where we are at, until we get through this court process we won't no the direction the club is heading in? The bad news...

Or an agreed percentage if they sold...which could be good business if it has been artificially inflated with internal management fees and interest on paper only. ;-)

I don't think she is on trial is she? So my comment is more on her character rather than evidence in a court case. If you read my posts on the JR you will see I am more interested in evidence and legal interpretations by people that know rather than jumping to conclusions.

The irony is she looked so obvious armed with a magazine, sunglasses and umbrella deployed as shields.

The legal mumbo jumbo might be very relevant then.