Search results

Probably because his name was getting chanted on a live TV so TalkSport have remember we exist and decided to give him a call. Last thing we need is him getting involved.

Do we have a sports psychologist at the club? I'd be getting Burge in to see someone like that and try and get him toughened up mentally. He seems to have confidence issues for long periods at a time which possibly impacts how vocal he is and his confidence in himself to come out and claim things.

They would have to take a huge salary cut to come here. And that would assume nobody in the Championship was interested in them.

Its not like this has come out of the blue. They would have been fully aware of the situation when they took the stadium on. If they haven't made an agreement with CCC that CCC cover any costs then that's nobodies fault but their own.

Possibly gives the EFL itself some protection from any SISU legal action.

Erm, its actually the court papers showing only Coventry City Council as a defendant.

If we assume Burge is going one way or another who are realistic targets to bring in? We'd have to be looking at either L2 or bottom half L1 keepers or someone higher up who can't get a game. Who will be a likely target?

I think we need to understand what happens if they vote to keep us in. The vote only happens if we don't have anywhere to play. If we have nowhere to play and they vote to not kick us out then what? Is it essentially a vote to say the club can be moved elsewhere, either temporarily or...

The reaction from some quarters when there’s even a suggestion of any action against Wasps would be hilarious if it wasn’t so tragic. Certainly puts to bed the idea that protests against Wasps are a waste of time to bed.

But we all know what happens when SISU lose that. The next appeal goes in.

No reason the Telegraph and CWR wouldn't get behind it and it requires a response from Wasps that isn't their usual 'but SISU' response. And if they try that or give another BS answer the trust should keep on at them.

I know but it just seems such an easy and obvious thing to do I struggle to see why we're as close to the deadline as we are and its not yet been taken onboard.

From the pictures of their crowd yesterday looks like the boycott is already doing very well.

The same would apply to us. If we said we aren't playing at the Ricoh but we're going to temporarily play at another stadium, that meets the FL ground requirements, in Coventry that would be fine. Problem is there isn't one.

The problem is its been left so late that there's not really time to start with a low key approach and ramp things up. I would rule out any action in the ground at a Wasps game. Just can't see it being effective. Their fans aren't really that bothered, look on their forum where there's plenty...

The video thing is easy. Anyone can take them on their phone (remember to hold it sideways!). Just short, say 10 second kids of what CCFC means to them. Get the kids on there and the old folks who have been going for years. People who go with their Dad, the kids in the family zone. Add in some...

Its so obvious now, surely everyone can see what is going on. New 'parody' twitter accounts popping up today as well.

Yet we have supporters wanting the EFL to take a strong stance and forbid the club playing elsewhere. Can the Trust not speak with the EFL and get some clarification as for months its been there's a deadline and we can't play out of Coventry. Now there's a vote.

Didn't occur to me at the time but you're absolutely right. Once the sub was lined up a yellow for time wasting and if he still didn't go another yellow and send him off.

This needs clarifying. We have no ground, they vote and don't kick us out. Then what?