Search results

Read your own posts. What has an ageing population to do with the EU? You named it as on of the problems caused by FOM.

What? „Are you taking the piss?“ is far more articulated and relevant? He is in your club mate. Maybe that is why you think he is articulated.

No. About half. But the right to FOM is reciprocal. The last figures I saw were net 72000 in a year. The population is over 65 million. I don’t think the current EU net migration is ruining the country for the remaining 65 million. I also don’t think leaving the EU will mean better...

There is a big difference between EU and Non EU. EU Migration is reciprocal and flexible. Many are already going back as circumstances change e.g. UK currency worth less, wages in their own countries rising. If there is a slump, many EU citizens will leave. Many are young and will be able to get...

I’m not. You may have been on the tinnies though as you appear not be able to put a counter argument together.

Statistical spike after Brexit. Poles attacked, threatened and a Spaniard hit on the head for speaking Spanish. People saying they would be prefer to be poorer to stop FOM. There were anti Polish Facebook groups- my niece was in one. That’s off the top of my head.

Me too. This is almost worse than the fixation with Selmayr’s appointment.

We have the option to control EU migration. We didn’t because it brought more benefits than problems. The infrastructure, housing crisis, and an ever increasing elderly population ( ffs, no one has ever blamed that on migrants, who are younger people, before) and train problems has little to do...

Yes, with reciprocal EU migration. I would like to know the statistics to the age and flexibility of EU migrants. If the economy fails in the UK, many will return home, as happened for a short time in 2008. I would also like to know how we are going to look after the old in 10 to 20 years time...

Maybe, but in a relatively short time the baby boomers will be needing care and the NHS is already under staffed.

That’s what happens in debates. People put their point of view across. Some agree with it, some don’t. If someone says something and I think it’s wrong, I will tell them. If they are right, they can provide evidence or a good counter argument. All you do is make some snide comment.

That’s what happens in debates. People put their point of view across. Some agree with it, some don’t. If someone says something and I think it’s wrong, I will tell them. If they are right, they can provide evidence or a good counter argument. All you do is make some snide comment.

Ü I think he’s saying that there will be less migrants and then they won’t be destroying our infrastructure, making people homeless and destroying our economy causing millions to suffer. Therefore you shouldn’t worry about the problems you associate with EU migrants as there will be less of...

Immigration is not going down though, just the EU portion. For the reasons I gave plus the overt racism of some people who blame all problems on EU migrants.

Half a billion includes us and who says how many will make use of that right? The trend is downwards anyway as other countries get richer and the pound continues to fall

FOM gives them permission. You claim that millions are suffering because of the EU. That is very debatable. The main reason being the collapse in 2008 and the resulting austerity program, together with neglect of most places north of Watford Gap. You turn it into EU membership and blame all...

Either way, whoever caused the crash is guilty, but it doesn’t help the car.

The car analogy is a bad one. If you were in a car heading for a brick wall you would at least put the brakes on. You would be at fault if the car crashed, but that wouldn’t help the car. Would like to see the council trying to something together with the „club“ though, as a collapse wouldn’t...

The snide remarks bit I get, but apart from the comment on 365 days of Eastern English strawberries, I have not noticed any meaningful contributions.

We were doing alright until you barged in.