Search results

Of course it isn’t. We are in a mess because we didn’t have a legally binding referendum which would have had to have had a qualified majority for such a major change of our unwritten constitution. A second referendum will have to follow the same format as the first. Which whilst not good, is...

He explained in parliament himself. It’s out there, you can google it or YouTube it. He explained his role. Sitting in a chair and saying nothing in order not to offend anyone is not his primary role. Defence of the House of Commons is not taking sides. It is his primary role. This government...

About as well as we are getting over a 52:48 vote. Only difference now is that we know what a load of crap leave actually is. Leavers can’t agree with themselves how it should be done.

I am quoting Bercow‘s argument.

The question is whether he broke the rules or not. He says not. On what basis have you decided he has?

Remainers have been constantly told you lost get over it. More people now want a second referendum. You don’t want them to have it. Denying the now majority of people the right to a final say on this disaster which everyone now agrees, ( apart from extremists), will result in at least short...

If we end up remaining, many leave voters will be unhappy. It will be decided by a second referendum which will be better regulated than the first as we now know the scams that were made to cheat. Criminal investigations are continuing. If a majority vote to remain, the unhappy leavers will be...

Weren’t you just on about Bercow and agreeing with the press and social media? He claims he will continue to stick up for the House of Commons against the government. He was elected to do this by parliament. You claim that he was elected to be neutral. He was elected to keep parliament to the...

You have to read the post t see that.

No. I never said he was.

I am not going to go through all that, but the people wanting a second referendum certainly think that the BBC is bias. Always leavers talking crap and people like Andrew Neill. Farage and co given too much time on question Time and a lack of pro EU MEPs on panels.

Jawohl mein Führer.

I have no idea what you mean, but I have a bottle of Poitin in front of me. So that’s all for now. Had a busy day.

I don’t see lifetime there. In any case, what is now on the table can only result in the UK being poorer. Which is not what the leave campaign promised. Are you content zone poorer for a generation to prove a point?

Yes. I said it should be the end of referenda. Future membership of the EU should be decided by the parliament- as it should have always been.

Says who?You? You don’t decide whether people vote again or not. Democracy is not a once in a lifetime occasion. That is dictatorship.

It doesn’t necessarily that you are a remainer. What Lammy said is that leave was a con and that, far from making things better for people, it would make things worse. Whether you like the result or not, most experts and many millions of people think that he is right on this. You are not a...

You are making things up as usual. I never said anything of the sort. I was referring to people who have said that they have blocked me. You have, then you peeked in a couple of times, then you blocked me again and then unblocked me and then blocked Tony. It’s called flouncing back and forth. I...

Tbf, you are an expert in being non bias.

He also explained his reasoning for that. I suppose he hit the nail on the head as far as many are concerned. The country needs people to get up and say clearly why we have to have another referendum. The whole thing is a mess and in a usual democracy you have a choice when there is a plan on...