Search results

so it was the stadium that lost us all those matches, got us relegated............ there was me thinking it was the players who couldnt defend, that stood watching in midfield or strikers that didnt score the goals whilst all paid more than the club had in turnover playing for managers that were...

you do realise that the club gets 5% commission on any/all away tickets it sells don't you?

I think SISU activated the option last June then didnt follow it through so the option is effectively dead any way

just to compare price levels here is BBC survey from 2012 http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-19842397 Northampton seem to be on the low side but only for league games the cup games are £50 extra

would guess the process can be stopped at any point by agreement with the liquidator. Liquidator has greater powers than an administrator to investigate what has gone on. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1986/45/part/IV/chapter/VII/crossheading/liquidators-powers-and-duties

hi TRS :wave: The creditor meeting - I would guess that CCFC/SISU/Appleton want it over sooner rather than later. ACL? well that depends if you believe they are sunk without CCFC or whether you believe they are viable without the football club. I have a feeling that ACL are getting to the...

as others have said first stage is for a judge to decide if there is a case. It is highly unlikely if it goes forward from there that there will be a court case until 2014

and yet TF has repeatedly said on Radio, in the press and at each of the fans forums............" the club is not for sale"

not sure SBJ - no one knows the details of the other offers other than Appleton apparently Also the terms of the bids were supposed to be cash offers only...... seems to me the writing off of debt is not a cash offer plus how has the value of the rates rebate and the value of player...

so at 31/05/11 the amounts included as owed to SISU in the SBS&L accounts was 29,679,942 plus 2,000,000 from ARVO = 31,679,942 deduct fom that the amounts funded in to Prozone Group and Prozone Sports 1,563,141 and 2,215,143 respectively leaves 27,901,658 from that exclude the £1,000,000...

The purchase was done by cash £96k, shares issued in SBS&L £2106 and net liabilities taken on of £3.9m. Clearly the net liabilities needed funding Prozone group was a number of companies but only Prozone Sports seemed to be trading Prozone Sports had small profits/losses 2009 profit £312k...

It was stated in accoounts at around 32m in total invested in SBS&L at 31/05/11 including 2m from ARVO. From what I can see not all of that had gone into CCFC because some of it had been used to purchase and fund Prozone. Plus I believe it also included approx £6m as debts to be paid to GR & MM...

Keep in mind this is a group situation that has one of its companies in administration Old debts - a large chunk of the debt relates to monies SISU took on at a discount when they came in but they did not discount in the accounts of CCFC Ltd or CCFC H. There was a large intercompany debt owed...

Not sure I understand - (dont have copy of accounts with me) but if you remove a creditor from the accounts then that would make the results better not worse. The last ACL accounts to 31/05/12 would have shown money owed by tenants to ACL in debtors but thats all tenants and other sources of...

I think things are at a turning point for ACL. It is quite clear they want CCFC to play at the Ricoh - plenty of evidence to support it, statements, offers to administrator, the appointment of the groundsman, the costs of renovating the pitch etc. My query would be is that want really an...

I would have thought a court has the power to impose a solution but it would involve further time in court arguing it. ACL in a difficult place - if they reject it then they will be portrayed as as anti CCFC and putting the club at risk of liquidation. If they accept it then they take a large...

I have no idea BSB ........... SISU appear to be the only ones that think the figures in doing so stack up

except the creditors are not being paid in full they are being paid 25.95p in the £ if they accept the CVA. 74.05% of the debt to unrelated creditors is not being paid - TF was playing with words just for a change :facepalm: The amount paid relates to a 25.95% of the debt accepted by the...

one thing is for certain 60.95m of debt has not disappeared from the Group ........... and in this context it is the bigger picture of the group that is important not the individual company of CCFC Ltd (using CT figures of 24.7 + 7.5 +11.5+ 7+ 10.25 = 60.95)

Just a couple of things Keep in mind this is a group situation that has one of its companies in administration Old debts - a large chunk of the debt relates to monies SISU took on at a discount when they came in but they did not discount in the accounts of CCFC Ltd. So in reality are nothing...