Search results

How do they get £800 -900K from the escrow account when there was only ever £536k in it ?

just a personal opinion but I don't think it was a single event or person I reckon it was the constant chipping away at the trust that existed between the parties (with events that happened, comments, not quite keeping to agreements, always asking for more ) until it got to a point when people...

I am assuming its the HOT or the indicative terms, I have never seen an actual signed contract mentioned anywhere

so no actual binding contract or binding terms then ?

not sure I could do it Godiva, having been told I work for CCC, ACL, AEHC, SISU, CCFC etc .............. I must have a conflict of interest in there somewhere :laugh::laugh::whistle:

out of interest when did SISU approach Yorkshire Bank? was it before or after ACL ( CCC & AEHC) did ? was it before or after YB told ACL there was a problem with the loan?

what was the judge asking ?

and a discussion led by the QC representing SISU at the moment. We still have to keep an open mind

was there any agreement that it should consider CCFC ? and as directors/stakeholders in ACL what duty did they owe CCFC to actually include them?

Did PWKH say it was their get out of jail card or was it the SISU QC that surmised it was ?

I think we have all done things we think are funny at the time and regret later Torch

that's the point I think........... so the charity documents can not be used in the JR unless they become public property

Honestly don't know FP. If the docs in one case become public domain.......... say are reported on the internet or copies in the press ............ then I would think anyone can use them

You would have to think that the balloons were only brought up in order to immediately paint a picture of a childish and irresponsible man to the judge....... I think you are right Godiva ................. I think they want to "expose" documents to make them public so they can use in the JR...

not to mention the "ballongate" affair was April 2013 almost 10 months after the end of the exclusivity period ended ......

Just a couple of questions hope you dont mind Rob - isnt it now the Higgs case not the SISUs case? SISU's case was dismissed yesterday wasn't it? - Has the timetable that you set out for witnesses been set/stated by the Judge? - Will all the other documents actually be relevant? The judge has...

Thoughts only winners are the lawyers - 8 on the SISU side that could easily be £4000 per hour in total ! SISU don't always win in court Will it make people think about some of the things being said by the Club directors ? - eg "batter in court" appears a little hollow this time around...

Couple of questions If the emails etc have not actually been used in the court are they public record? It seems that there has been plenty of legal argument prior to a case actually starting in terms of witnesses and documents. If the case was struck out or simply decided by the judge on the...

I think the process would be that the legal costs etc would be sent to be "taxed". The court will decide what is reasonable in that respect. In terms of the costs claimed by the actions then I would think they will have to be proven to the judge

The Otium part of that is interesting. from its incorporation in 2011 through to 31/05/13 then the only costs disclosed in the accounts is interest payable to ARVO and the write down of the loans made to CCFC H (they sourced the money from ARVO). The accounts say they have no employees. So how...