Search results

So why look to purchase it at all..... let alone pay reported sume of 2m, 5.5m etc etc Wonder what they think it is worth now?

He is a Trustee of the Charity Nick

There was no deal though only HOT's ....... hadn't done the due diligence so there couldn't be a final price could there?

so the deal referred to with Yorkshire bank is not connected to the share purchase then ? In which case how does the CCC loan affect the Charity share deal proposed in May/June?

question - if they only continued funding the club because they wanted the Charity share why are they still "funding it"? Isn't Ms Deering an employee? In which case what authority for decision making does she have? What authority does she have for issuing funding or negotiating? - no t having...

i think something like that was said don

In one sense no LS but the purpose of the exclusivity period is to get the due diligence done. They had a time limit that had to be met or an agreed extension. Seems neither happened

largely irrelevant if the Charity Trustees felt capable of dealing with the matters raised I would have thought up to Charity whether they seek their advisors to be involved or not

Haven't had a good record with due diligence it seems, I could be wrong of course

So if she accepts that the exclusivity ended then Charity in rights to offer elsewhere

There was a mechanism that that SISU apparently paid £1m for that gave them the ability to purchase the Charity share any time up to 2015 I believe - the option Of course it couldn't be actioned as soon as the rent and any other bills were outside of the normal terms for settlement. So...

who is Miss Lucy Barlow?

have they ? :thinking about:

so if he did "misinform" the Charity would that have changed the decisions the Charity came to? Not convinced it would

Chris West is an officer of the council not a councillor There may of course be a reasonable explanation for what has been said when CW is allowed to have his say. Quite wrong to label him a liar on a one sided cross examination Will the whole JR rise or fall on whether SISU got told that 2...

Did the Higgs barrister raise any points of interests or rebut any points when questioning PWKH or PH. Did the Judge make any comments or seek clarification from either?

True but that wasn't the point I was making ...... the way it has come across to me is that PWKH and PH have been truthful in their answers no matter the difficulty of the question or the results of the answer

I don't think it is a question of AEHC pointing fingers at CCC or its officers, more that PWKH and PH are not prepared to lie to cover up actions or inactions ...... ie they will answer truthfully.......... what was done or not done can not be altered

Fisher and Seppala put the debt for rent as follows. The original demand £1.4m less the rates rebate £230k less the escrow account £536k leaves amount due £634k (in round figures) ....... which is the amount or thereabouts in the administrators report .......

don't think so stupot because it was disclosed in the CCFC accounts as restricted funds (ie the account balance)