Search results

Does that not mean there was a conflict of interest though for CBRE?

Exclusivity ended 31/07/12, Charity contacted SISU 07 August to say it would not be extended because no progress made, assurances not received etc, at that point (before West report 17/08/12) the Charity felt they were free deal with other third parties if there were any. Certainly it was made...

Original proposed deal was gone by 31/08/12. Both sides had let if fall by then. The revised "deal" that never was is suggested at £2m in October 2012 West's valuation of the Charity share actually has nothing to do with the value at which the Trustees were prepared to sell at though does it...

But the judge in his written judgement makes clear there was no such "deal" for £2m merely a conversation LS. The Trustees never agreed to it. It is also on the trial transcript page 151 Day 3

Actually I said it was a mis use not an abuse there is a difference ....... and I made no premise at all about single issue candidates other than in this very specific case as it relates to GCBTR. It is others that are making the assumption I reject single issue candidates in general ..... a...

It is hard to comment on this without it coming across as a put down. Clearly we must all do what we feel to be right and what we can. GCBTR have chosen this way and feel it is the right way to go and that I understand and respect. My personal opinion is that this is a mis use of the democratic...

and the freedom of information act enquiries covered Coventry City Football Club, - Otium Entertainments Limited, - SISU Capital, - CBRE - or any individuals or companies acting on their behalf,

with the greatest of respect to messrs Hoffman & Elliott I have never really seen them as a game changer ....... I know others have

its a verification process rather than an audit fp. The reports are different and the responsibilities different. Audits of companies are done under the Companies Act due diligence isn't. You have to be registered with the relevant bodies to do an audit you don't for due diligence. Not all...

any idea when that was Jack ?

would not have thought so wingy. The JR will primarily be about state aid and the actions of the Council so cant see why they would be relevant

Hind sight is a wonderful thing:D so using that, in reasonable chronological order did the game changers start with the establishment of Otium? or the ARVO mortgage charge over CCFC assets? or the restructuring by error or other means of the playing side? by CCFC Ltd become something its...

debt free............ SISU and CCC were supposed to pay off a discounted loan from YB........... would that not mean ACL would owe CCC and SISU for the amount with which the loan was settled? Could SISU actually have achieved a far better deal than was arrived at, well we can only take their...

Firstly I would be careful of making any allegation of unethical behaviour against AEHC. They had a duty of care towards SISU only until such time as the exclusivity period ended. The Judge was very specific in his judgement making it clear that the conduct of the Charity was in good faith and...

Just to be clear when I ask the following I am not alleging illegality by any party but a lot seems to be made of West not telling SISU the plan B. As far as I can see there is no legal requirement to do so nor any contractual obligation to be met. My own feeling is similar to Harris, ethics say...

yes you are right typo by me have corrected

That was the meeting in December ...... a long time after the escrow was depleted. There was £536k in the Escrow account rent was £110k pm. Rent strike started 02/04/12. I believe the meeting was intended to give the bank comfort as to the way forward. Deloittes acted for YB I believe and...

So you are saying that before any basis for working together SISU via this firm of Chartered Surveyors had unilaterally approached the ACL loan providers to arrange meetings ? If not hostile you would have to say it would be viewed as unhelpful and certainly without authority by ACL and its...

Could simply have been someone getting carried away and over stepping their authority though.:thinking about:

I think the issue of SISU unilaterally approaching Yorkshire Bank without consent of ACL is dealt with on pages 28 to 31 of Day 1 Court transcripts. Seppalas reaction to it is on page 31. It is made clear that the approach strategy in March 2012 should be ACL & CCC & Charity. As it later turned...