Search results

The fact that both Tim and Joy have said we've moved on from the Ricoh leads some to conclude that we're not going back there. Therefore we must either be stuck at Sixfields forever or building a new stadium as otherwise it means Tim and Joy are lying. I'd rather be back at the Ricoh but that...

Someone will doubtless correct me if I'm wrong but didn't Ricoh sign an extension to the deal for another 10 years?

Having purchased from the shop, via the website and over the phone I've never been contacted by the club. That doesn't mean the club are being rubbish as I may well have ticked the box that says don't contact me which I'd normally do.

I'd actually like all that to be true and just wanted some proof that it was. ;) They may not have set the lawyers loose yet but that doesn't mean they don't, their love of the courts is well known.

The word "are" in the original post needed to be followed by the word "probably" as otherwise it appears to be stating a fact not an opinion. I agree that they are likely to be suffering from a lower income at Sixfields but we don't know for a fact that they are running short of cash. No one has...

The fact that we'll be taking such a large number of supporters to MK does make a statement to SISU/CCFC/Tim/Joy. The level of support indicates that despite our move to Northampton and the low gates there, we are still prepared to support our team just not at Sixfields . We are taking this many...

That's a pretty strong allegation to make, can you back that up with any proof?

Unless Joy and Tim have been lying to us, Plan A is the New Stadium, so we need to make that our home and forget about the Ricoh. Or are you saying that Joy and Tim have been lying?

Ideally I'd like owners who can buy ACL and make us self sufficient through the Ricoh revenues so that we don't have to rely on their continued input of cash.

Just looked on Amazon and yeah the back cover does make it 100% certain it's the Ricoh - see http://www.amazon.co.uk/Running-Firm-James-Bannon/dp/0091951518/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1383997686&sr=8-1&keywords=Running+with+the+firm#reader_0091951518&tag=skblta-21 and click back cover.

No worries, what I'd like to see is evidence from both sides about that meeting (although ideally about everything in this sorry mess ;)) after we're out of Northampton - but I think my lottery numbers have more chance tonight than that.

Yes I did pick certain paragraphs out - you're quite correct but it wasn't because I was trying to be one sided - if you read it again I actually say we can't be 100% certain what was said. I picked those because they related to the July meeting where it is alleged that the freehold at her price...

Ooh that's made me laugh, I read an interview with Barney Francis (Sky Sports MD) in CITY AM a week or so ago where he said: - See more at: http://www.cityam.com/article/1382933274/sky-sports-boss-who-set-resume-battle-bt#sthash.uryeVEAp.dpuf I bet BT getting the rights wasn't what they wanted...

What she said to Les Reid in the infamous interview was this http://www.coventrytelegraph.net/news/coventry-news/coventry-city-fc-owner-joy-6096912 So from reading that If she doesn't go in for negotiations that waste time and she says she wants the freehold and won't rent then it is very...

Great result tonight, was hoping to go but was reminded last night I was supposed to be at a family dinner. :( Had sneaky glances at the phone throughout the evening until told to stop. PUSB

Very well deserved for SP and I hope he is as please as we are - but I worry the curse may now be upon us.

Well it's a common mistake so not that surprising you didn't know.

What the point where someone claimed something was a fact without any references or qualifying statement?

I've said it before but just because he appears to be a nice guy and as far as I know has never lied to us doesn't mean that we should take what he says at face value. PWKH represents the people and organisations that he's mentioned in this thread and as such can't be considered neutral in all...

Sorry to burst your bubble but the Titanic was never just described as "unsinkable" before the sinking, it was described as "practically unsinkable" by the White Star Line but then they were hardly unique in claiming that, other lines did that too. The builders Harland and Wolf in Belfast never...