Search results

q.e.d.

I wish you would leave the forum. Your own posts or those that respond to you are responsible for 90% of the nastiness on this forum.

Interesting - someone is obviously doing some digging and the bodies are beginning to turn up.

That you had agreed to walk around wearing a sandwich-board or post a few fly sheets for them.

Up Fisher's arse

That is the $64,000 question. On top of wages, they have to find about £150k a month for the administrator and legal fees. Tell Cardoza not to accept any cheques!

Coventry a bigger club than Northampton while at Sixfields? It will only take a season before we are in the same division as them (assuming they don't get promoted), have lower gates, less money and are going backwards. Forget the past, the present and the future determine how "big" you are...

Your simplistic explanation ignores the fact that SISU rent their own head office.

As well as clearing up everything else that SISU have been accused of, it would be nice to know why they were so desperate to make their investment in CCFC (or earlier in Southampton) by 14 December 2007. It was probably a coincidence that tighter money laundering regulations became law on 15...

I think it is much more appropriate in the original :D

Yes, unfortunately I think we can look forward to lot more 'ball lickers'.

So it's alright for them to steal the football club, but not the fixtures and fittings?

Even if there is any truth in this (which I doubt), there seems to be no shortage of corporates willing to sponsor arenas that don't have football clubs attached. This year alone, Scottish Hydro are sponsoring new arena in Glasgow (£1.5m p.a.) and First Direct sponsoring a new arena in Leeds.

It, currently, costs just £60 to lodge a request for a judicial review. If you employ a lawyer to prepare the request, then their charges will obviously depend on how much work they do to refine the case. Dumping a couple of thousand pages at the court is hardly refinement.

Not mine, a close relative's.

At the moment, nothing has to be proved to the satisfaction of a court. A request has been made for a judicial review of the council's decision to take on the ACL loan. At this stage, a judge will decide if the request has any merit based on the papers that were lodged with the request. A...

More likely that SISU will turn Northampton Town into CCFC over time, i.e. homeless, penniless, friendless and an even more uncertain future.

Exactly. Despite the nonsense spouted by another poster, a judicial review is a very cheap way to delay or obstruct a decision. This has been recognised by the government and there are new measures being introduced to stop the widespread abuse of the judicial review system. I do hope when...

That, I admit, is not my usual sort of response, but it is the only credible response to someone who first claims to be a lawyer and then claims that a judicial review is an expensive way of litigation.

So the results of judicial reviews are not made public and councils keep quiet about the outcome - your imagination is now going into overdrive.