Search results

when one side can argue clearly why they arn't valid reasons and the people proposing the reasons can't argue why it is valid then it's a bloody good indication.

if my wife comes home today and someones nicked her car I'll be outraged, if I see on the news tonight that someone has stolen a car I'll not even notice it to be honest, if questioned on it I'd agree it was wrong but I won't be outraged and why would I be, we couldn't live as human beings if we...

The reasons weren't valid and I'm sure they didn't believe them themselves. need the revenues for long term future of the club, need the revenues for ffp, they make good sound bites, the first one is even true for the most part but as reasons for moving to northampton they don't hold up.

It's basically just the money coming in vs the money going out over a period of time, could be a month, could be a year. if you pay off 10m of debt, you arn't making yourself worse off, in fact it's probably a very positive thing for the future but it gives you negative 10m cash flow. if you...

those weren't valid reasons though, the directors of ccfc have to act in the best interests of ccfc, doing something for the benefit of sisu that is against the benefit of ccfc isn't fulfilling their statutory duties.

it was the same everytime we took 7k to mk dons, blah blah double standards, blah blah hypocrits, no one (well hardly anyone) was outraged about franchise football, we were outraged because they were killing our football club for their own ends. The only real talk about franchise football were...

Rubbish and poor show, I completely understood their arguments and it's not that I didn't agree with them (though I didn't) it's that those arguments weren't valid, they didn't believe them themselves nore could they defend them, unfortunately they were never properly forced too.

It's not about agreement, they never provided one valid reason that they could properly stand behind, unfortunately our poor media who weren't willing to fall out with the club couldn't properly push them to defend their reasons. There were no valid reasons to move us from the perspective of...

basically cash flow positive means over a period of time the money coming in is greater than the money going out. it doesn't really mean anything in terms of how you are doing financially, unless cash flow gets so low that you arn't able to pay your debt. you can have negative cash flow and...

if someone is 50k in debt and is paying, 3 percent interest on that money and you give them a pound they are not cash flow positive. If you have 5 mill in debt, but your income in January is 300k and your outgoings are 300k and you give them a pound then yes they are cash flow positive. edit -...

yes we will and we will be right too and if you can't understand the reasons why and why that isn't hypocrisy then there isn't really much point discussing it.

I've already said I think moving wasps is wrong though that it doesn't outrage me because there are so many much more outrageous things in the world that deserve my outrage more. Sisu were lying though when they said the move was for the survival of the club, there were, no, zero, none valid...

but there were no valid reasons for moving us.

Over and Over again we see people commenting about double standards and hypocrisy, It's not valid because for the most part people weren't up in arms about us being moved to Northampton because a sports team was being ripped from it's community. We were all up in arms because OUR! sports team...

Agreed but that isn't what most people took from the statement and presumably isn't what they wanted us to take from the statement. Suddenly there is alot of people posting how Pressley has the money to be top 10 because of the fans forum. yet I just don't see how its true, especially combined...

yes it could include any or all of those, thats very much my point that there is a lot of criticism of Pressley because he has the budget for top 10 yet we don't seem like a top 10 team, but if it includes departed high earners, paying of baker etc then he doesn't have a 2.7mill a year top 10...

It seems alot of people feel Pressley is seriously under performing because we have a wage budget of 2.7 million (which comes from the recent forum?) if its true that we are currently spending this on players then while summer recruitment was very difficult I'd still agree that he is seriously...

bragging threads never a good idea, i just wish you had been right

To be fair they also said the council loan to ACL, didn't affect them or change anything in a statement when it happened and yet we were soon embroiled in major court battles over it. I don't think you can learn much from what they say.

maybe but if that were the case and you were a conservative why wouldn't you vote against and come out against it, it's pretty rare for opponents to happily agree with the opposition, you would think there would be political capital to be made in saying labour are betraying the football team...