Search results

  1. N

    Higgs Share Update

    last time there was due dilligance involved, sisu wanted information that cost higgs money to provide, it was agreed sisu would pay for that, they didn't and we had a whole court case on it, so it's not really a surprise that higgs aren't falling over themselves to help provide more due...
  2. N

    Higgs Share Update

    if sisu bid the same as wasps and agree to anything else that wasps agreed to regarding investment in the area and higgs rejected it or the council vetoed it then while I'd still completely understand the reasons for doing that it absolutely would swing alot of peoples opinions and make them...
  3. N

    Higgs Share Update

    they probably do want wasps to have it, but it looks like it was ccfcs for the taking if they had put the bid in, or it would have at least forced a veto making sisu the good guys and the council the bad, but no they didnt have the info and now the deadline is past. hmmm
  4. N

    Higgs Share Update

    They could have put a bid in by now if they wanted to by the sounds of it, higgs gave a deadline, ccfc have not yet bid saying they need more information, higgs say they are unable to provide the info sisu want for due diligence, sisu write to the council asking them to sort it out, the letter...
  5. N

    Sixfields - you'll like this!

    I think you'll find he agrees with you, a bit of sarcasm miscommunication there I feel.
  6. N

    Sixfields - you'll like this!

    I've never understood it, sure it would have been nice if Northampton had said no you can't play here but I have no issue with them doing what they thought was best for themselves and saying yes, we should have been demanding our own club act in its own best interests not berating another club...
  7. N

    This has to be said..

    i wrote this about it on another thread It seems alot of people feel Pressley is seriously under performing because we have a wage budget of 2.7 million (which comes from the recent forum?) if its true that we are currently spending this on players then while summer recruitment was very...
  8. N

    This has to be said..

    yeah i realise what he said, but a budget to me is what you plan to spend, or what you can spend, not what you are spending, while I think its very misleading to give the amount they are allowed to spend under ffp as the playing budget I do think it's still a reasonably valid statement and so...
  9. N

    This has to be said..

    personally I imagine its the amount we are allowed to spend under ffp and not what we are spending (ie a completely worthless statistic)
  10. N

    This has to be said..

    It absolutely can be denied, it's far from a fact that we have spent a decent amount on player wages and brought in good players this season. In fact everything other than Steve waggot saying (our budget is 2.7mill) points to the opposite. Sisu (and that includes waggot) are masters of the...
  11. N

    Time to Go Sisu.

    For the most part if you have a long lease then the value of the leasehold isn't much different to owning the freehold but with the place you linked to you are paying the freehold owner £1330 a year which is 14% of the rental income assuming full occupancy and not paying for an agent to find...
  12. N

    It's not Rocket Science

    I didn't say no one would apply for the job, there will be dozens of applicants of course there will. I said I think we will be worse off if we sack him and I do think we'll struggle to attract someone better. As for the rest of the post I give up, I'm obviously not explaining my point properly...
  13. N

    It's not Rocket Science

    I realise that and don't disagree that many of the league rely on free transfers, you and many others believe that means that the way we have acted puts us on a par investment wise with the other clubs who are only buying frees. I don't agree with that at all. no one else had to try and rebuild...
  14. N

    It's not Rocket Science

    The fact they went to the league above proves the point I'm trying to make but I'm not convinced you understand, we needed to invest in order not to go backwards because our best players were leaving. You can't say well we spent nothing and X team spent nothing and X team is doing better than us...
  15. N

    It's not Rocket Science

    again too simplistic, how many teams sold nearly all their best players including the vast majority of the goals in the squad and a great keeper and then didn't spend anything to replace them?
  16. N

    It's not Rocket Science

    I do, the way the club was/is being run will have made players want to leave/not want to sign. Any player with any sense would have wanted out over the last couple of years if a similar deal or better came along.
  17. N

    It's not Rocket Science

    This is too simplistic a way to look at squad investment. While I don't believe everyone above us has spent more, I do believe we are the squad with the least investment. We all know that free signings are in many cases a gamble in this league that most clubs have to take, however if you have...
  18. N

    Wasps

    Of course we should, not a single person thinks that this doesn't suck for wasps fans, even if it is the only way to save the club (and I'm not saying it is).
  19. N

    Wasps

    We aren't getting back to the PL under any scenario under SISU, staying where we are is still preferable to building a new stadium, buying the Ricoh would have been the best option of course it would, thats what we all wanted years ago when they said they were going too. The fact they havn't...
Top