Search results

TBH the only things that I'd like to know are the Richardson revelations that were convered up by his confidentiality clause.

I'd say that I also support Leamington and Rugby, which is funny as they're old rivals-but not really in the time that I've followed them. I also like Nuneaton, the 3rd part of that bizzare hate triangle. Basically, any of our local nonleague sides. I don't consider them as rivals (yet!) and...

I'm just totally sick of it all. We never get anything out of them and it's just more off-field turmoil to distract from the team, which is enough of a mess without that!

Truth and SISU, now that's oxymoronic! Honestly, do you really want more court cases? I support a football club, not a litagation concern! If we are never involved in a court case again, I will be delighted.

Nice one Hill, top man. What were the terms of the bet again exactly? McQ to score X number of goals?

But surely you agree that it's impossible to know for sure? Certainly nobody posting on here knows. It seems logical to assume it's thrue though as SISU aren't exactly pumping money into the playing side, but they've taken quite a lot out of it. At the same time, they have been pissing money...

Come on Nick, be honest, at least with yourself: you're not explicity defending SISU, no, but you are attempting to "debunk" an argument often used by people when they are criticising SISU. By proxy, this is in effect defending SISU, don't act dumb, you know that.

You see him jogging back into the picture towards the bottom of the screen. I assume that he went on an overlap as we tried to attack and was caught out by the counter, which is maybe to be expected when you're 2 down with minutes to go.

I like Hill, but honestly, he'd probably stay exactly where he is for that exact reason. He loves that club, too. If we were a division higher, maybe, but why swap a relegation battle for a playoff chance? Because of our greater potential? I'm not feeling that any more.

This is reminding me a bit of The Inbetweeners, but it's quite funny.

Bleak reading. So we're boring, we can't create or score, but we concede.

"84% would like, 81% rate, 34% believe". I'm surprised that many believe it!

Only he's on a one year deal and we probably won't be able to afford his wages, especially given that we supposedly pushed the boat out to sign him (whoops!). Still, he'll probably go to someone like Gillingham and bang in 20 goals next season...it's the Coventry Way, don't you know.

No they bloody aren't! We're talking specifcally about Daniels and Adams. Daniels should have been given an opportunity as an attacking midfielder rather than frozen out for, generally speaking, more defensive options; Adams should have been kept because he was the clubs best LB, but we let him...

I don't think that anyone is saying that, more that players under-perform with us and we do let players go that we should have kept.

Doh. "Lets take a look at what you could have won..." Can you imagine Finch or Thomas ever scoring a goal like that? Or indeed Barton or Fleck as they're never that advanced up the pitch...plus, Fleck would have trapped that and passed it to someone else!

Lol, great minds and all that...

Get Jim Smith in to be his Assistant, that usually works.

Oi! Stop nicking my point! ;)

That was well random. Aren't one of Corden or Horne a Spurs fan, so might know of him from '87? I think they're both big footy fans. Still, it's an obscure reference!