Search results

One side would have had you believe ACL was a thriving business. The other would have you convinced ACL was on the verge of collapse. I would suggest the truth lies somewhere between those two versions - although neither side is very likely to publicly admit that in the near future.

Whose side am I supposedly on this week? I lose track.

Derek Richardson says he's not interested in the land around the stadium. http://www.coventrytelegraph.net/news/coventry-news/wasps-owner-reveals-motives-ricoh-8331444

See above. I also don't think you are giving the average reader enough credit.

Everything seems to be dealt with through written statements these days. Makes it more difficult to challenge. Lessons learnt from mistakes of past spokesmen perhaps... Of course, I'll keep digging on all the relevant issues. As always! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Yeah, I got a message about this. I was away last week, but did reply. Best way would be to draft something and send to [email protected] Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Contradictory statements are surely no longer a surprise to you in this fiasco? All parties have been guilty of it at various points. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

According to Wasps chief executive Nick Eastwood. FYI: http://www.coventrytelegraph.net/news/coventry-news/wasps-chief-says-sisu-legal-8330161

Thanks guys. We are aware. We're very limited as to what we can report once people are charged. Strict contempt laws govern what we can report. I'm sure more detail will emerge in court. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

That's fair comment. I see your point. And I know "I don't write the headlines / sub headings" probably won't cut it as a response!

Bloody hell, I'm used to getting a rough ride from time to time, and I'm happy to accept constructive criticism, but I'm not sure what I've really done wrong here? Could it be that people are annoyed with the actual subject matter and are directing that anger / frustration at me / the CT...

I actually asked from comment from ACL/Wasps initially and was told the football club would be the most appropriate party to comment. Hearteningly there seemed to be a will not to fall out or put anything provocative out in response from all sides. It certainly would have been different in the...

Hey, I'm not saying I've never got a steer on here! Deleted member 5849 pointed me in the direction of something the other day and I acknowledged it. It would be a bit silly to ignore potential stories from any source wouldn't it?

To be fair, we first got the email about this from Mike on November 17. I wrote the story on Nov 20. It's just taken us a while to get up because we were waiting for a pic from Mike.

I disagree that it's a non-story. I think it's a talking point - and it seems to be drawing in a fair few readers this morning. I understand his point. Fans were sold the bricks on the basis that they were helping to build the home of Coventry City. Some feel it's no longer the club's home...

Mr Goalby wants his Ricoh Arena brick back. Do you? http://www.coventrytelegraph.net/news/coventry-news/coventry-city-fc-fan-demands-8161823

As a journalist I try not to rule anything out! That's all. But as I say, it would be a surprise. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Certainly not Mr Ranson. Maybe we will find out more about what went on behind the scenes in time, but the message I am getting at this moment is that Derek Richardson led the charge on this personally and financially.

Sometimes people like us to understand things that aren't necessarily entirely accurate. But I'd be surprised if that was the case here.

I think it's fair to say "the Telegraph understands that he isn't involved with Wasps".