Search results

Suggest you read the other posts then that say its a good or great idea rather than trying to twist my words in order to make another pointless contribution Nothing wrong with asking questions far more constructive than childish name calling and derogatory comments

Emirates has next to no parking and Arsenal Fc advise against driving there. However it is surrounded by rail and underground links Etihad has some parking but relies on other parking sites much the same way as the ones near prologis etc for the Ricoh What about somewhere like Rotherham for a...

If it happens its a great idea But It will require more than just building a stadium. There will need to be infra structure improvements, road improvements etc. Improvements to bus and rail links coincide with match days or are viable 7 days per week. Yes it will bring people in to the City...

based on my own personal reaction, you know good old gut feeling and above that I don't have to justify my feelings on here

probably but my post was how I felt about the news and ccc reaction at this moment

then the feeling I have would be wrong - doesnt make me or them wrong at this precise moment, it is just a truthful expression of how I feel about the news now

I get that feeling too fp but not sure who is calling who's bluff at the moment

I would think that it was always intended as a multi purpose and multi sport venue - so that it would maximise income ?: Would think the leaseholders of Butts Park Arena would argue it was therefore unfair and unreasonable for such a restriction to be on their stadium. These things can be...

http://www.afcb.co.uk/news/article/south-stand-afc-bournemouth-stadium-expansion-plans-3012635.aspx latest plans but still up to only 14259

Capacities Crystal Palace Selhurst Park 25,456 Swansea Liberty Stadium 20,909 Bournemouth Vitality Stadium 11,464 Everyone else bigger http://www.skysports.com/football/news/11685/10216534/west-ham-have-third-biggest-premier-league-ground-after-expansion Swansea have plans to increase to 32k...

This is still going to take a long time to achieve even if successful - planning permissions needed - planning objections - possible referral to Secretary of State - possible legals - funding requirements to sort - then 18mths? to build Say 4 years total? possibly much longer How long did the...

I cant find it but I am sure this restrictive covenant isn't new, sure I saw mention of it a while back. That the 125 year lease CRFC had contained the restriction

from the council you mean.........

I certainly didn't think it could be done on that site because of the parking and traffic issues. If it can its a good idea and I will hold my hands up and say I was wrong. Still not convinced that it will happen though, very long way to go and the time frame is not necessarily that short...

But that's the point the method of valuation has to be one that is based on generally accepted principles, based on all the relevant information, appropriate to the situation, and properly applied at the date of the transaction. That is what will be tested in court. It would be very hard for...

But the PR will achieve what? People will read it then file it, if that. Not saying it should not be done but I do not see that much will be gained especially as it wont happen for a long time. If CCC win both JR's then the impact will be quickly forgotten Yes SISU like to throw as much as...

Getting the timeline out in the open will certainly be interesting. However it will achieve what exactly? It wont change the deal that was done. It will however entrench opinions but it is better that it is out in the open. It will of course create lots of debate on here. In reality it will...

The biggest damage done to the Charity interest in CCFC was the abrasive day to day relationship they had with SISU in my opinion. In the end whether CCC had structured the deal with Wasps or not the Trustees just wanted out and away from the grief it was causing