Search results

There are always things going on in the background, to date nothing has happened to change anything. Could it yes but just equally no for all the evidence we have. We have random supporters in the know, with egos massaged (not talking of those who make clear they heard a rumour), and no real...

Surely the optimum position is the right mix of finance with what you put forward. I totally accept that a club must have its roots firmly in the community & heritage. That the argument has skewed too much towards finance, even more skewed though towards people being firmly stuck in the past...

Highlight of this afternoon was liquid gold's commentary ..... amused me and made me chuckle on another poor football day Best Ccfc commentator is still sw88 . Gets my gold star for all his efforts this season. Thank you.

The fact that Venus is still listed is not significant its just, not for the first time, a delay in filing. Fisher not being paid is not new information it has been around for several months. There were comments in CT and observer about it not to mention fans forums when fisher confirmed it...

Ceased to be paid directly by Ccfc around Feb 2015 I believe....... there is more than one way to get round that. Frankly though fisher is a fundamental part of what is going on paid or unpaid. So he acts for free completely under seppala's behest then :banghead: Only thing I want to wait and...

Having met and talked at length with the TF on several occasions I am happy with my analysis

Suggest you do some research at companies house. The day to day running of Ccfc is down to the board of director. Sisu provide the overall strategy. Yes fisher reports to Sisu but he isn't just a public shield for Sisu.... he actively controls and carries through his decisions within the...

Folks that's me done for a few days. Enjoy your Easter and lets hope the improved form for CCFC continues and carries through to 2017/18 season Happy Easter PUSB

not asking him to drill down the finances. It isn't a misquote of an off the cuff interview it is a prepared statement. It isn't short hand for anything is this bit of his statement wrong or right? "The club does not get either matchday non-ticketing revenues or non-matchday revenues". That...

Lot of questions didn't get answered or were deflected or passed over largely because of the way a number people (quite understandably) wanted their say, rant or diatribe. It needed people to listen but in that format it was never going to happen

Look the figures & % ages etc are going to vary from team to team. The point of the first post was that we have more income than match day tickets, the assertion made by Fisher in his statement yesterday was simply incorrect

Here is the bit that Grendel highlighted earlier, different clubs have different definitions of match or commercial income You also have to look at the fact they got to the playoff semi finals, good cup runs against big(ger) teams including Chelsea and put on a pop concert. All that will have...

Design: Scunthorpe United Stadium – StadiumDB.com Scunthorpe United given FULL planning permission to build stunning new stadium at heart of Lincolnshire Lakes project Gives an indication for cost of BPA perhaps. Lead times started December 2013. None of which helps Mr Fisher either on his...

think comparisons are tricky at times - eg some clubs include player trading as turnover others (CCFC) don't I would have more sympathy with the Fisher if there was some evidence of the CCFC trying to develop other income sources, thinking outside the box or simply creating partnerships to...

Final thought on comparison between Scunthorpe and CCFC 2015/16 Turnover SUFC £3.7m Player sales £0 total spend before interest 6.9m Turnover CCFC £5.4m Player sales £2.5m total spend before interest 7.3m League position SUFC 7th CCFC 8th...

Have a happy birthday all the same :)

The original posting was to illustrate that we do indeed receive income other than match day ticket income :banghead: I think it is safe to say that is the case isn't it!

think you have to own your own stadium or at least have a long term commitment to something to get that 30%.............. which then of course brings the indirect costs like capital finance or higher rents & stadium overheads 365/24/7 in to play ............. which then decreases the amount F&B...

You are comparing two different things so the comparison is flawed. You can only do a valid comparison of the £70k to the net figure (turnover less costs) that Scunthorpe receive which at a 30% margin would be £110k. Any other comparison is a fisherism

I would guess 365/24/7