Search results

It's also the 'Islam is an evil, false, wicked religion but fair play to him as he's killed a load of paedos' stance that is honestly totally beyond me.

"In a video message posted yesterday, virulently anti-LGBT pastor Steven Anderson reacted to the terrorist attack at a gay nightclub in Orlando, Florida, by happily announcing that "there's 50 less pedophiles in this world." "These homosexuals are a bunch of perverts and pedophiles, that's who...

This response to the situation in Orlando is honestly breathtaking -

I'm trying to work out if your username indicates you have a brilliant sense of humour or a huge misunderstanding of irony.

I'm happy about the situation? No, I'm just not buying into baseless conspiracy theories. Some people talk business, others get on with it. That doesn't mean I'm happy that the situation that CCFC find themselves in. What has people regurgitating the same arguments/points here achieved or...

Rasist!

I wasn't reply to your post.

Go off on one? You get how debates work right? I fully understood what you were trying to get across and still don't get why you brought blame into the equation. Who's being blame? Blamed for what? Also this thing about Wasps taking the piss/being able to do what they want - the fact they're...

So you didn't say Wasps are taking the piss, can do what they want and everyone else is taking the blame?

But there's no blame being levelled, because no blame can be levelled. The fact it's fucking over the Academy doesn't mean the process should or is be dealt with in any other way, because opinion doesn't form part of planning law/regs. I'm fully aware of what's going on, I just don't buy...

In this day and age I honestly don't think it goes on, certainly not within Councils and around the actual application process - but this is my personal opinion. Planning Law is heavily leant towards the applicants and it's actually far easier for an application to all run smoothly. I think...

What is 'the council'? Who does this include/not include in your opinion? I'm not quite sure how you seem to think that planning officers don't form part of 'the council'. An application is submitted for an area surrounded by fields and another in the middle of a residential area - you think...

How can they influence things? Would be intetested to find out how you think that would work.

How?

So they should just rubber stamp any application from BPA and reject the Higgs application, based on your opinion? Planning regs/law should just be ignored?

So you're saying the Planning Department have worked outside of their powers/remit?

You can't place blame on an organisation that have no other option. If an application does not fall within planning regs/law it has to be rejected. You can't overrule them, as the highlighted issues would still be present and those impacted upon would have grounds to bring litigation against...

But the problem is it won't have any impact - it will be read by an officer, uploaded to the portal and then filed. Even if it were to be before the Planning Committee only the brief details would be listed of what people have said, but each specific objection/comment wouldn't be listed. I'm...

Yes, the what can/can't be considered are - Reasons that would be considered: Loss of light or overshadowing Overlooking/loss of privacy Visual amenity (but not loss of private view) Adequacy of parking/loading/turning Highway safety Traffic generation Noise and disturbance resulting from...

The problem is that if the application falls within planning law/regulations even if a thousand comments or objections were submitted they wouldn't impact on the process. People are entitled to disagree with the application and point out the impact it will have on the Academy, but personal...