shmmeee
Statue Outside the CBS
- Joined
- Jul 11, 2011
- Messages
- 77,357
- Reaction score
- 83,205
Rob Guerney thinks we’ve dodged a bullet by not signing Mudryk.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Losing at home to Hull is grim though isnt it let's be honest. I kind of agree on the strongest 11, the subs the other day were all shocking though.In fairness , we lose to man city saturday we are 3 points worse off than you expected to be but still only 3 games in
WE have to give them chance to get it right , the strongest 11 on paper looks pretty solid
To be quite honest I got so tired of being typecast based on the 20/21 season that I turned it into a character to play for the gallery.Its just annoying. I'm not even a negative person regarding this club really and have refused to join in with multiple meltdowns during Lampards reign, but has anyone been enthused by anything they've seen so far?
I seriously hope people are dragging this up like they do when the likes of you, BSB, Saddlebrains and co melt down and it turns out ok, but I don't see it happening.
You can turn things around way easier in the Championship. You can go and win anywhere on your day whereas we have to back up a home defeat to Hull by heading to Man City.I’m hoping it too. Read through the meltdown after the post Gyokeres rebuild today and that was posted in October and sounded very similar. I just worry at this level it gets in your head and you become a whipping boy but in the Champ you can be bottom at Xmas and go up in the playoffs.
Losing at home to Hull is grim though isnt it let's be honest. I kind of agree on the strongest 11, the subs the other day were all shocking though.
Rob Guerney thinks we’ve dodged a bullet by not signing Mudryk.
I hope every CCFC meltdown I’ve ever had is thrown back in my face because it would mean that things have turned around.Its just annoying. I'm not even a negative person regarding this club really and have refused to join in with multiple meltdowns during Lampards reign, but has anyone been enthused by anything they've seen so far?
I seriously hope people are dragging this up like they do when the likes of you, BSB, Saddlebrains and co melt down and it turns out ok, but I don't see it happening.
try the more subtle approach, ask if he is call diety as people say "oh my fucking god" at most things he saysI've deleted my post insulting Diety as it was done in anger. He winds me up with his bullshit sometimes but I still shouldn't have and apologise. No one asked me to do this, I just want to meltdown in peace.
Perhaps for once he's the sensible one and I've lost my head. His track record isn't great but we'll see.try the more subtle approach, ask if he is call diety as people say "oh my fucking god" at most things he says
I think we're switching formation from what ive heard, so we wont be using wingers, going to a 5 at the back.Surely if he's our only left wing cover and we are trying to sell, we have more incomings in mind?
If you're right that's a load of money paid to Burnley for someone we won't be startingI think we're switching formation from what ive heard, so we wont be using wingers, going to a 5 at the back.
we'll be playing wingers even if we go 3 CBs, EMC is not as good when not on the left and and we are not writing of Loum after 2 games.I think we're switching formation from what ive heard, so we wont be using wingers, going to a 5 at the back.
He can play anywhere in the front line, so it makes sense, Mason clarke can also play behind the striker, i believe he did for Peterborough sometimes. Sakamoto has also played behind the striker for us, we could go back to the box midfielder and also play 51212If you're right that's a load of money paid to Burnley for someone we won't be starting
Sakamoto at number 10 is just ridiculousHe can play anywhere in the front line, so it makes sense, Mason clarke can also play behind the striker, i believe he did for Peterborough sometimes. Sakamoto has also played behind the striker for us, we could go back to the box midfielder and also play 51212
we are not playing EMC or Tats thereHe can play anywhere in the front line, so it makes sense, Mason clarke can also play behind the striker, i believe he did for Peterborough sometimes. Sakamoto has also played behind the striker for us, we could go back to the box midfielder and also play 51212
Yes, surely he's completely unqualified for the role of Prime Minister.Sakamoto at number 10 is just ridiculous
Probably still be better than a lot of the people that have been though.Yes, surely he's completely unqualified for the role of Prime Minister.
And boy does it show!And technically you don't need any qualifications whatsoever to be PM.
I am pretty sure we tried to play tats there previously and it was pointless.He can play anywhere in the front line, so it makes sense, Mason clarke can also play behind the striker, i believe he did for Peterborough sometimes. Sakamoto has also played behind the striker for us, we could go back to the box midfielder and also play 51212
we are not playing EMC or Tats there
Swansea away, I think Godden scored and if I remember rightly ro0adworks as soon as we got to Wales.I am pretty sure we tried to play tats there previously and it was pointless.
Agreed on everything but the final sentence. The early signs being exclusively based on one game v Hull though.To be quite honest I got so tired of being typecast based on the 20/21 season that I turned it into a character to play for the gallery.
Last season however was the peak of supporting CCFC and I don’t think realistically is going to be topped. I had hoped for a brave fight against relegation though and that looks in doubt based on the early signs.
2 games in. 2!To be quite honest I got so tired of being typecast based on the 20/21 season that I turned it into a character to play for the gallery.
Last season however was the peak of supporting CCFC and I don’t think realistically is going to be topped. I had hoped for a brave fight against relegation though and that looks in doubt based on the early signs.
The second part of that sentence is true, but we were not the better side.As for Hull, we were the better side but lost in a smash and grab.
Hull had 2 shots at 0.02 xG until the 74th minute of the game. As Jamie Carragher pointed out, we probably tried to force a win too much.The second part of that sentence is true, but we were not the better side.
They executed their game plan, we didn't.
It's not the window I'm concerned about, but how a series of poor performances will affect confidence in a league that we'd be near the bottom of even with everything being favourable.
I didn't say they deserved to win, just that we weren't the better team. We weren't.Hull had 2 shots at 0.02 xG until the 74th minute of the game. As Jamie Carragher pointed out, we probably tried to force a win too much.
Hull defended well and limited our chances but were in control and looked favourites to break the deadlock before one mistake cost us.
Hull won’t stay up playing like that.
Hull had 2 shots at 0.02 xG until the 74th minute of the game. As Jamie Carragher pointed out, we probably tried to force a win too much.
Hull defended well and limited our chances but were in control and looked favourites to break the deadlock before one mistake cost us.
Hull won’t stay up playing like that.
Basically lay on a grenade. It’s a question of who explodes first, him or Lampard.I think CWR hit a bullet by bringing him back