Wake up supporters - you are being conned! (3 Viewers)

I am largely a reader of this forum, not a poster (I'm unsure of precisely what my post count is, but it will be low), but I have to make an exception in this case.

I've avoided this forum like the plague now for some time because frankly it's depressing watching the majority of supporters peddle the agenda of the club's landlords and particularly the council who have been heavily involved with the skullduggery surrounding our club, principally because they seem to have you all convinced that their hands are not blood stained, despite the punitive measures they have taken against your football club!

It is no secret that SISU have consistently left us wanting more during their tenure, but yet two facts remain;

1. They have invested a large sum of money in our club (albeit whilst annotating it on the balance sheet as loans).
2. Everybody seemed to be happy with progress this year under SISU until this stadium debacle.

Ultimately, SISU are in the right here, as painful as it might be to admit it. It has been well publicised that there are impending problems for clubs under the 'financial fair play' rules. Predominantly this is very simple, we can only spend what we make in ticket sales/sponsorship etc on sustaining the club and maintaining a competitive playing squad.
At present we make precious little, and consequently, we will really feel the bite when these rules come into force. If you think a ten point deduction is hard to swallow, the consequences of not fitting in with these rules will have our club in a serious nosedive and have us tumbling down the leagues quicker than you can say 'maybe that coffee guy was right'.

Simply put for the primate contingent of this forum; some derp once upon a time made a real balls up when negotiating rent for our stadium and as a result, the cash we get in return for the tickets we sell aren't sufficient to support the club without the owners putting money in - which it is not viable long term for those owners to do because in time they will be prohibited from doing so.
The owners are business people, and bought in with the idea one day of either taking a considerable dividend or planning an exit strategy to sell the club on. This is their right and I support that. We aren't playing subbuteo here, we're playing football manager...

The club had every right to request that the arena bosses revisited the rent agreement. It is in their best interests for the club to prosper! The club and the stadium are supposed to behave like husband and wife. The stadium is cheating on the club at the moment with the council! I'm sure if the club became champions league chasers, then the arena would be looking for a substantial rent increase! This works both ways....

This exercise on SISU's part, is simply to demonstrate to the arena bosses that their arena cannot survive without the club. I support that, and you should too!

If we were smart supporters instead of sheeples, your lean would be on the arena bosses and not the club. You'd all turn out in force at Northampton to support our team at home games and frighten the life out of the arena bosses. Additionally you'd all be emailing the businesses that operate on the arena site encouraging them to demand a rent decrease in line with the footfall reduction as a result of CCFC departing from the site.

Our football club can only survive if we procure the stadium or have a rent agreement that allows us access to a lion share of the money that the supporters invest in watching the team!

The council stifled the club's attempt to get serious with the arena bosses by spending FOURTEEN MILLION POUNDS OF TAXPAYERS MONEY propping up ACL. Surely on this forum there are some people who have suffered from council cuts - be it redundancy, policing deficiencies, or perhaps they turn your streetlights off at night turning your area into a criminals wet dream? How can they spend 14M of your money like that, and nobody raise any objection?

Ultimately, if you were to protest against the council, perhaps their intervention would be punishable. Perhaps they'd have to recover their 14M and ACL would have to remortgage that 14M - Almost impossible with no viable tenants!

Perhaps then the arena will need to be sold to the people who would most benefit from it. Not SISU - your football club!

This is all a big game of smoke and mirrors, and SISU will get their way because they are a bunch of sharks - but the supporters are making it unnecessarily difficult for them - Your allegiance is to the club, not the council - I guarantee most here have been wronged by the council some way, at some time in their lives.

The club, (in my opinion) will unlikely play long-term at Northants. But if we turned out there in force to support our team, instead of these protests of about five people that frankly look pitiful, perhaps we can affect positive change over our clubs future and restore it to former glory.

Does anyone understand how irksome it is, every time our captain posts about tennis/golf/his holiday/his pets it is for you all to turn it into some innuendo filled rant about the club and the owners.

I'm sure you will all have your problems with this post, but I could no longer be silent.

PUSB!

Twitter #ashturnerdotcom
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Super post -- wait for the heap of manure to be dumped on your head by our supporters who are more one eyed than cyclops when it comes to our plight.
 

hughes87

New Member
At last someone talking sense, its not or sisu fault like everyone on here keeps saying acl, council and the higgs trust are to blame as well but everyone just keeps blaming sisu
 

dadgad

Well-Known Member
There's a number of holes in your propaganda.
Where does one start?
Sisu cud av negotiated a different rental agreement five years ago but chose not to. That wuz when gates were approx 21,000 and we had players worth selling.
That was a model from which the current buzz word "SUSTAINABILITY" was worth building on.
Unless you start with this recent historical and very relevant perspective nothing you say can have any credibility whatsoever.
 

Johnnythespider

Well-Known Member
You should wake up and smell that coffee you just popped in for. That is all !
 

mattylad

Member
I am largely a reader of this forum, not a poster (I'm unsure of precisely what my post count is, but it will be low), but I have to make an exception in this case.

I've avoided this forum like the plague now for some time because frankly it's depressing watching the majority of supporters peddle the agenda of the club's landlords and particularly the council who have been heavily involved with the skullduggery surrounding our club, principally because they seem to have you all convinced that their hands are not blood stained, despite the punitive measures they have taken against your football club!

It is no secret that SISU have consistently left us wanting more during their tenure, but yet two facts remain;

1. They have invested a large sum of money in our club (albeit whilst annotating it on the balance sheet as loans).
2. Everybody seemed to be happy with progress this year under SISU until this stadium debacle.

Ultimately, SISU are in the right here, as painful as it might be to admit it. It has been well publicised that there are impending problems for clubs under the 'financial fair play' rules. Predominantly this is very simple, we can only spend what we make in ticket sales/sponsorship etc on sustaining the club and maintaining a competitive playing squad.
At present we make precious little, and consequently, we will really feel the bite when these rules come into force. If you think a ten point deduction is hard to swallow, the consequences of not fitting in with these rules will have our club in a serious nosedive and have us tumbling down the leagues quicker than you can say 'maybe that coffee guy was right'.

Simply put for the primate contingent of this forum; some derp once upon a time made a real balls up when negotiating rent for our stadium and as a result, the cash we get in return for the tickets we sell aren't sufficient to support the club without the owners putting money in - which it is not viable long term for those owners to do because in time they will be prohibited from doing so.
The owners are business people, and bought in with the idea one day of either taking a considerable dividend or planning an exit strategy to sell the club on. This is their right and I support that. We aren't playing subbuteo here, we're playing football manager...

The club had every right to request that the arena bosses revisited the rent agreement. It is in their best interests for the club to prosper! The club and the stadium are supposed to behave like husband and wife. The stadium is cheating on the club at the moment with the council! I'm sure if the club became champions league chasers, then the arena would be looking for a substantial rent increase! This works both ways....

This exercise on SISU's part, is simply to demonstrate to the arena bosses that their arena cannot survive without the club. I support that, and you should too!

If we were smart supporters instead of sheeples, your lean would be on the arena bosses and not the club. You'd all turn out in force at Northampton to support our team at home games and frighten the life out of the arena bosses. Additionally you'd all be emailing the businesses that operate on the arena site encouraging them to demand a rent decrease in line with the footfall reduction as a result of CCFC departing from the site.

Our football club can only survive if we procure the stadium or have a rent agreement that allows us access to a lion share of the money that the supporters invest in watching the team!

The council stifled the club's attempt to get serious with the arena bosses by spending FOURTEEN MILLION POUNDS OF TAXPAYERS MONEY propping up ACL. Surely on this forum there are some people who have suffered from council cuts - be it redundancy, policing deficiencies, or perhaps they turn your streetlights off at night turning your area into a criminals wet dream? How can they spend 14M of your money like that, and nobody raise any objection?

Ultimately, if you were to protest against the council, perhaps their intervention would be punishable. Perhaps they'd have to recover their 14M and ACL would have to remortgage that 14M - Almost impossible with no viable tenants!

Perhaps then the arena will need to be sold to the people who would most benefit from it. Not SISU - your football club!

This is all a big game of smoke and mirrors, and SISU will get their way because they are a bunch of sharks - but the supporters are making it unnecessarily difficult for them - Your allegiance is to the club, not the council - I guarantee most here have been wronged by the council some way, at some time in their lives.

The club, (in my opinion) will unlikely play long-term at Northants. But if we turned out there in force to support our team, instead of these protests of about five people that frankly look pitiful, perhaps we can affect positive change over our clubs future and restore it to former glory.

Does anyone understand how irksome it is, every time our captain posts about tennis/golf/his holiday/his pets it is for you all to turn it into some innuendo filled rant about the club and the owners.

I'm sure you will all have your problems with this post, but I could no longer be silent.

PUSB!

Twitter #ashturnerdotcom
Your post falls down on one simple fact which is they haven't invested anything! they have loaned and charged both interest and management fees for those loans. They expect every penny back.

If it were an investment then they would understand that sometimes these don't pay off.
 
Thank-you chaps - Bottom line is, SISU haven't done a lot right during their time here. But to support the council in their underhanded efforts to prevent our club from capturing the one asset that would bring greatness again is psych-ward committal worthy.
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
Yeah it's all ACL's fault that attendances dropped by 4,000 in the space of a season and the team got relegated again. They even stopped us selling season tickets, the bastards!
 
And we're the ones being conned?

Part of me genuinely wonders if you are on the pay roll of SISU or you're name is Tim Fisher. But I will give you the benefit of the doubt and entertain this post.

If you think this all has to do with rent and match day revenues then you, sir, are very naive.

Besides which, you have completely ignored SISU's terrible mismanagement of the club. Something that, in itself, stinks of people with no interest in football.
 

Sky Blue Pete

Well-Known Member
Deluded!! Just one thing. £14m loan will be repaid to Ccc.

There is no equity in the blame in this debacle!!

Sisu are significantly more culpable than any other party. The one thing I will accept is that other parties have some responsibility.

No one is forcing Sisu to take Ccfc out of Coventry and for that I despise them
 
Your post falls down on one simple fact which is they haven't invested anything! they have loaned and charged both interest and management fees for those loans. They expect every penny back.

If it were an investment then they would understand that sometimes these don't pay off.


If they hadn't chalked it up as a loan then they wouldn't be the main creditor in this administration jazz - and we'd be completely at the mercy of ACL.

They're writing a ton of it off under admin recovery proposals, so actually, I think my post was valid sir. They aren't looking to bleed the club, only to retain control and recover some of the money they've put in. Why shouldn't they, they aren't a charity?
 

colin101

Well-Known Member
I am largely a reader of this forum, not a poster (I'm unsure of precisely what my post count is, but it will be low), but I have to make an exception in this case.

I've avoided this forum like the plague now for some time because frankly it's depressing watching the majority of supporters peddle the agenda of the club's landlords and particularly the council who have been heavily involved with the skullduggery surrounding our club, principally because they seem to have you all convinced that their hands are not blood stained, despite the punitive measures they have taken against your football club!

It is no secret that SISU have consistently left us wanting more during their tenure, but yet two facts remain;

1. They have invested a large sum of money in our club (albeit whilst annotating it on the balance sheet as loans).
2. Everybody seemed to be happy with progress this year under SISU until this stadium debacle.

Ultimately, SISU are in the right here, as painful as it might be to admit it. It has been well publicised that there are impending problems for clubs under the 'financial fair play' rules. Predominantly this is very simple, we can only spend what we make in ticket sales/sponsorship etc on sustaining the club and maintaining a competitive playing squad.
At present we make precious little, and consequently, we will really feel the bite when these rules come into force. If you think a ten point deduction is hard to swallow, the consequences of not fitting in with these rules will have our club in a serious nosedive and have us tumbling down the leagues quicker than you can say 'maybe that coffee guy was right'.

Simply put for the primate contingent of this forum; some derp once upon a time made a real balls up when negotiating rent for our stadium and as a result, the cash we get in return for the tickets we sell aren't sufficient to support the club without the owners putting money in - which it is not viable long term for those owners to do because in time they will be prohibited from doing so.
The owners are business people, and bought in with the idea one day of either taking a considerable dividend or planning an exit strategy to sell the club on. This is their right and I support that. We aren't playing subbuteo here, we're playing football manager...

The club had every right to request that the arena bosses revisited the rent agreement. It is in their best interests for the club to prosper! The club and the stadium are supposed to behave like husband and wife. The stadium is cheating on the club at the moment with the council! I'm sure if the club became champions league chasers, then the arena would be looking for a substantial rent increase! This works both ways....

This exercise on SISU's part, is simply to demonstrate to the arena bosses that their arena cannot survive without the club. I support that, and you should too!

If we were smart supporters instead of sheeples, your lean would be on the arena bosses and not the club. You'd all turn out in force at Northampton to support our team at home games and frighten the life out of the arena bosses. Additionally you'd all be emailing the businesses that operate on the arena site encouraging them to demand a rent decrease in line with the footfall reduction as a result of CCFC departing from the site.

Our football club can only survive if we procure the stadium or have a rent agreement that allows us access to a lion share of the money that the supporters invest in watching the team!

The council stifled the club's attempt to get serious with the arena bosses by spending FOURTEEN MILLION POUNDS OF TAXPAYERS MONEY propping up ACL. Surely on this forum there are some people who have suffered from council cuts - be it redundancy, policing deficiencies, or perhaps they turn your streetlights off at night turning your area into a criminals wet dream? How can they spend 14M of your money like that, and nobody raise any objection?

Ultimately, if you were to protest against the council, perhaps their intervention would be punishable. Perhaps they'd have to recover their 14M and ACL would have to remortgage that 14M - Almost impossible with no viable tenants!

Perhaps then the arena will need to be sold to the people who would most benefit from it. Not SISU - your football club!

This is all a big game of smoke and mirrors, and SISU will get their way because they are a bunch of sharks - but the supporters are making it unnecessarily difficult for them - Your allegiance is to the club, not the council - I guarantee most here have been wronged by the council some way, at some time in their lives.

The club, (in my opinion) will unlikely play long-term at Northants. But if we turned out there in force to support our team, instead of these protests of about five people that frankly look pitiful, perhaps we can affect positive change over our clubs future and restore it to former glory.

Does anyone understand how irksome it is, every time our captain posts about tennis/golf/his holiday/his pets it is for you all to turn it into some innuendo filled rant about the club and the owners.

I'm sure you will all have your problems with this post, but I could no longer be silent.

PUSB!

Twitter #ashturnerdotcom[/QUOTE


Thanks Mr Fisher
 
Thank-you chaps - Bottom line is, SISU haven't done a lot right during their time here. But to support the council in their underhanded efforts to prevent our club from capturing the one asset that would bring greatness again is psych-ward committal worthy.

Our club, or SISU?

The stadium is a community asset and transcends football.
 

johnwillomagic

Well-Known Member
I have not bothered to post on this site for ages due to myopic/moronic rants from many blaming sisu for everything that has gone wrong and not admitting that acl or council have not contributed substantially to our current plight.

Well done coffee this is a much better and more contructive post than I have seen for the past two months on the forum.

None off us like the mess we are in but terms and arrangements currently to use the Ricoh are not financailly substainable even more so with FFP. i hate the idea of ground share with Northampton but if we got a purpose built stadium that we own in Cov that holds 20-25 000 then I would be willing to suffer the very bitter pil of a short term groundshare.

For us to stay at Ricoh acl would have to write off debt and as they have £14m plughed into them by the council suggest if they really cared they should do this and then renegotiate a rent dependant upon division we are in and attendance in line if you like with FFP.

Long way to go with all this mess and depsitewat people claim on this forum no-one really knows exactly how this is going to play out! :mad:
 

Sky Blue Pete

Well-Known Member
One more thing sorry.

Ccfc will not own the arena a hedge fund will who have proved without doubt that they have no interest in the success of ccfc
 

skybluegod

Well-Known Member
I understand your post and from a business point of view Sisu are in the right. However morally they are so far in the wrong. They cannot move us out of Coventry not for an hour not for a day and definitely not for three years. Yes it is better financially for the club under Sisu, but it would be better for everyone if Sisu just left and let someone like GH, who ACL are willing to work with, save this football club.
 
Deluded!! Just one thing. £14m loan will be repaid to Ccc.
No one is forcing Sisu to take Ccfc out of Coventry and for that I despise them

14M will be repaid, only if the unlawful arrangement stands. If the agreement is terminated then CCC will only recover what the site sells for.

And CCC forced the withdrawl of the club. They have control over the whole city - easiest way to circumvent that is to follow CCFC out of their grab range.
 

CovFan

Well-Known Member
If SISU ever gained ownership of the stadium I'm 100% sure we'd be turfed out or the "rent" would be significantly increased.
 

Sky Blue Pete

Well-Known Member
14M will be repaid, only if the unlawful arrangement stands. If the agreement is terminated then CCC will only recover what the site sells for.

And CCC forced the withdrawl of the club. They have control over the whole city - easiest way to circumvent that is to follow CCFC out of their grab range.
Allegedly unlawful!!!

Ccfc cease to exist if they have home games out of Coventry!!!
 
The stadium is a community asset built in partnership with the club. No club, no point in having the stadium.

And are people REALLY accusing me of being Tim Fisher? That's excellent, and downright stupid at the same time!
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
If they hadn't chalked it up as a loan then they wouldn't be the main creditor in this administration jazz - and we'd be completely at the mercy of ACL.

They're writing a ton of it off under admin recovery proposals, so actually, I think my post was valid sir. They aren't looking to bleed the club, only to retain control and recover some of the money they've put in. Why shouldn't they, they aren't a charity?

No they aren't. The Higgs Trust however is and filled the breach when this club ran up monstrous debt and built its academy when we couldn't afford one. The council's aims are a bit cloudier but there is one half of ACL that has done a great deal for the club.
 

valiant15

New Member
People were happy with this seasons progress under sisu? Er no they weren't and what progress was that then? Mid table in the 3rd division. Whoopee fucking do.
 

bigfatronssba

Well-Known Member
One simple question just-here-for-coffee. Who is responsible for the running of Coventry City Football Club?
 
The stadium is a community asset built in partnership with the club. No club, no point in having the stadium.

And are people REALLY accusing me of being Tim Fisher? That's excellent, and downright stupid at the same time!

Built in partnership with club. Yes. Not SISU. Who have proven that they have no interest in football.

That you can ignore their mismanagement of your club is simply astounding and is the reason many on here are wondering if this post is genuine or if you have some kind of alternative agenda.
 
People were happy with this seasons progress under sisu? Er no they weren't and what progress was that then? Mid table in the 3rd division. Whoopee fecking do.

Cloud cuckoo land. I never knew we had fans that were so downtrodden they were beginning to accept that kind of 'progress'.
 

bigfatronssba

Well-Known Member
I am largely a reader of this forum, not a poster (I'm unsure of precisely what my post count is, but it will be low), but I have to make an exception in this case.

I've avoided this forum like the plague now for some time because frankly it's depressing watching the majority of supporters peddle the agenda of the club's landlords and particularly the council who have been heavily involved with the skullduggery surrounding our club, principally because they seem to have you all convinced that their hands are not blood stained, despite the punitive measures they have taken against your football club!

It is no secret that SISU have consistently left us wanting more during their tenure, but yet two facts remain;

1. They have invested a large sum of money in our club (albeit whilst annotating it on the balance sheet as loans).
2. Everybody seemed to be happy with progress this year under SISU until this stadium debacle.

Ultimately, SISU are in the right here, as painful as it might be to admit it. It has been well publicised that there are impending problems for clubs under the 'financial fair play' rules. Predominantly this is very simple, we can only spend what we make in ticket sales/sponsorship etc on sustaining the club and maintaining a competitive playing squad.
At present we make precious little, and consequently, we will really feel the bite when these rules come into force. If you think a ten point deduction is hard to swallow, the consequences of not fitting in with these rules will have our club in a serious nosedive and have us tumbling down the leagues quicker than you can say 'maybe that coffee guy was right'.

Simply put for the primate contingent of this forum; some derp once upon a time made a real balls up when negotiating rent for our stadium and as a result, the cash we get in return for the tickets we sell aren't sufficient to support the club without the owners putting money in - which it is not viable long term for those owners to do because in time they will be prohibited from doing so.
The owners are business people, and bought in with the idea one day of either taking a considerable dividend or planning an exit strategy to sell the club on. This is their right and I support that. We aren't playing subbuteo here, we're playing football manager...

The club had every right to request that the arena bosses revisited the rent agreement. It is in their best interests for the club to prosper! The club and the stadium are supposed to behave like husband and wife. The stadium is cheating on the club at the moment with the council! I'm sure if the club became champions league chasers, then the arena would be looking for a substantial rent increase! This works both ways....

This exercise on SISU's part, is simply to demonstrate to the arena bosses that their arena cannot survive without the club. I support that, and you should too!

If we were smart supporters instead of sheeples, your lean would be on the arena bosses and not the club. You'd all turn out in force at Northampton to support our team at home games and frighten the life out of the arena bosses. Additionally you'd all be emailing the businesses that operate on the arena site encouraging them to demand a rent decrease in line with the footfall reduction as a result of CCFC departing from the site.

Our football club can only survive if we procure the stadium or have a rent agreement that allows us access to a lion share of the money that the supporters invest in watching the team!

The council stifled the club's attempt to get serious with the arena bosses by spending FOURTEEN MILLION POUNDS OF TAXPAYERS MONEY propping up ACL. Surely on this forum there are some people who have suffered from council cuts - be it redundancy, policing deficiencies, or perhaps they turn your streetlights off at night turning your area into a criminals wet dream? How can they spend 14M of your money like that, and nobody raise any objection?

Ultimately, if you were to protest against the council, perhaps their intervention would be punishable. Perhaps they'd have to recover their 14M and ACL would have to remortgage that 14M - Almost impossible with no viable tenants!

Perhaps then the arena will need to be sold to the people who would most benefit from it. Not SISU - your football club!

This is all a big game of smoke and mirrors, and SISU will get their way because they are a bunch of sharks - but the supporters are making it unnecessarily difficult for them - Your allegiance is to the club, not the council - I guarantee most here have been wronged by the council some way, at some time in their lives.

The club, (in my opinion) will unlikely play long-term at Northants. But if we turned out there in force to support our team, instead of these protests of about five people that frankly look pitiful, perhaps we can affect positive change over our clubs future and restore it to former glory.

Does anyone understand how irksome it is, every time our captain posts about tennis/golf/his holiday/his pets it is for you all to turn it into some innuendo filled rant about the club and the owners.

I'm sure you will all have your problems with this post, but I could no longer be silent.

PUSB!

Twitter #ashturnerdotcom

Your post suggests that you agree that sisu are deliberately trying to destabilise Acl. The fact you openly support such underhand tactics tells me everything I need to know.
 

colin101

Well-Known Member
Quote by 'just-here-4-coffee' 'They have invested a large sum of money in our club (albeit whilst annotating it on the balance sheet as loans).'

I take it from this comment your talking about the investment in our club the season we were relegated
 
I'm ticked, but unsurprised by the responses.

Everyone has their right to an opinion, only some people's are in my opinion very clouded.

We were climbing the league. We'd captured decent loan signings. Signed one of the league's top strikers. We'd signed a decent loan LB on a permanent deal. We were progressing in cup competitions (Even though one was a mickey-mouse paint cup).

You can argue till the cows come home, and I will read and digest your opinions.

Fact remains, despite SISUs multitude of failings (which you all seem to fail to note I mentioned in my original post), they are right on the stadium goings-on.

And i'm fractionally better looking than big-Tim, so I must confess, i'm hurt by the accusations.
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
I'm ticked, but unsurprised by the responses.

Everyone has their right to an opinion, only some people's are in my opinion very clouded.

We were climbing the league. We'd captured decent loan signings. Signed one of the league's top strikers. We'd signed a decent loan LB on a permanent deal. We were progressing in cup competitions (Even though one was a mickey-mouse paint cup).

You can argue till the cows come home, and I will read and digest your opinions.

Fact remains, despite SISUs multitude of failings (which you all seem to fail to note I mentioned in my original post), they are right on the stadium goings-on.

And i'm fractionally better looking than big-Tim, so I must confess, i'm hurt by the accusations.

We were climbing the third division having entered it from the second. Note you casually ignore the number of times the charity has stepped in and bailed us out when we were totally skint.
 
Your post suggests that you agree that sisu are deliberately trying to destabilise Acl. The fact you openly support such underhand tactics tells me everything I need to know.

It's a game of politics. ACL are just as guilty of underhanded tactical-warfare. I support SISU's destabilisation of ACL for one reason - it's in the club's best interests to shock these people into cooperation.

This is ALL about the club. Forget SISU.
 

bigfatronssba

Well-Known Member
I'm ticked, but unsurprised by the responses.

Everyone has their right to an opinion, only some people's are in my opinion very clouded.

We were climbing the league. We'd captured decent loan signings. Signed one of the league's top strikers. We'd signed a decent loan LB on a permanent deal. We were progressing in cup competitions (Even though one was a mickey-mouse paint cup).

You can argue till the cows come home, and I will read and digest your opinions.

Fact remains, despite SISUs multitude of failings (which you all seem to fail to note I mentioned in my original post), they are right on the stadium goings-on.

And i'm fractionally better looking than big-Tim, so I must confess, i'm hurt by the accusations.

What happens when Ccfc have to pay rent to the sisu owned stadium. Will you support that?

Not that it will get built anyway, sisu are losers, pure and simple. They don't know how to win, they only know how to destroy.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top